Analysis of aromatic delocalization: Individual molecular orbital contributions to nucleus-independent chemical shifts

被引:154
作者
Heine, T [1 ]
Schleyer, PV
Corminboeuf, C
Seifert, G
Reviakine, R
Weber, J
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Phys Chem & Electrochem, D-01169 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Georgia, CCQC, Dept Chem, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Geneva, Dept Phys Chem, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[4] Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Inorgan Chem, SK-84236 Bratislava, Slovakia
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jp035163z
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Individual molecular orbital (MO) contributions to the magnetic shielding of atoms as well as to the nucleus-independent chemical shifts (NICS) of aromatic compounds can be computed by the widely used gauge-including atomic orbital (GIAO) method. Detailed analyses of magnetic shielding MO-NICS contributions provide interpretive insights that complement and extend those given by the localized MO ("dissected NICS", LMO-NICS) method. Applications to (4n + 2) pi-electron systems, ranging from [n] annulenes to D-nh S-3, S-5, and N6H62+ rings as well as to D-2h cyclobutadiene, show the extent to which their diatropic character results from the sigma framework and from the pi orbitals. The diatropicity of both these contributions decreases with the number of nodes of the wave function around the ring. The highest-energy orbitals can become paratropic. This is generally the case with the sigma orbitals, but is found only for "electron-rich" pi systems such as sulfur rings. MO-NICS contributions, which can be interpreted using London-Huckel theory, correlate with inverse ring size.
引用
收藏
页码:6470 / 6475
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   LCAO X-ALPHA CALCULATIONS OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC SHIELDING IN MOLECULES [J].
BIEGER, W ;
SEIFERT, G ;
ESCHRIG, H ;
GROSSMANN, G .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1985, 115 (03) :275-280
[2]   Interaction energies and NMR chemical shifts of noble gases in C-60 [J].
Buhl, M ;
Patchkovskii, S ;
Thiel, W .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1997, 275 (1-2) :14-18
[3]  
Bühl M, 1999, J COMPUT CHEM, V20, P91, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19990115)20:1<91::AID-JCC10>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-C
[5]   A comparison of models for calculating nuclear magnetic resonance shielding tensors [J].
Cheeseman, JR ;
Trucks, GW ;
Keith, TA ;
Frisch, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 104 (14) :5497-5509
[6]   The change of aromaticity along a Diels-Alder reaction path [J].
Corminboeuf, C ;
Heine, T ;
Weber, J .
ORGANIC LETTERS, 2003, 5 (07) :1127-1130
[7]   Evaluation of aromaticity: A new dissected NICS model based on canonical orbitals [J].
Corminboeuf, C ;
Heine, T ;
Weber, J .
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 5 (02) :246-251
[8]   To what extent can aromaticity be defined uniquely? [J].
Cyrañski, MK ;
Krygowski, TM ;
Katritzky, AR ;
Schleyer, PV .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 2002, 67 (04) :1333-1338
[9]  
DAUBEN J, 1968, J AM CHEM SOC, V90, P811
[10]  
Davies D.W., 1967, THEORY ELECT MAGNETI