Model to predict prostate biopsy outcome in large screening population with independent validation in referral setting

被引:17
作者
Porter, CR
Gamito, EJ
Crawford, ED
Bartsch, G
Presti, JC
Tewari, A
O'Donnell, C
机构
[1] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Sect Urol & Renal Transplant, Seattle, WA 98111 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Urol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Josephine Ford Canc Ctr, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.049
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To develop a model capable of predicting prostate biopsy outcomes in a large screening population, with independent validation in the referral setting. Methods. Data from 3814 men participating in the Tyrol screening project were used to develop the model. Prospectively collected data from two independent sites in the United States (Virginia Mason Clinic, Seattle, Wash and Stanford University, Stanford, Calif) were used to validate the model independently. The Tyrol data was split randomly into three cross-validation sets, and a feed-forward, back error-propagation artificial neural network (ANN) was alternately trained on a combination of two of these data sets and validated on the remaining data set. Similarly, three logistic regression (LR) models were produced and validated using identical cross-validation data sets. The Tyrol model with the median area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was then validated against the Virginia Mason (n = 49 1) and Stanford University (n = 483) data sets. Results. The AUROCs for the three cross-validations were 0.74, 0.76, and 0.75 for the ANN and 0.75, 0.76, and 0.75 for the LR models. The mean AUROC for both ANN and LR was 0.75 with a standard deviation of 0.009 for ANN and 0.006 for LR. The AUROCs for the Virginia Mason and Stanford University data were 0.74 (both ANN and LR) and 0.73 (ANN) and 0.72 (LR), respectively. Conclusions. This model, designed to predict the prostate biopsy outcome, performed accurately and consistently when validated with data from two independent referral centers in the United States, suggesting that it generalizes well and may be of clinical utility to a broad range of patients. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 941
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Akaike H., 1973, 2 INT S INFORM THEOR, P267, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15, 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15]
[2]   Performance of a neural network in detecting prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen reflex range of 2.5 to 4.0 ng/ml [J].
Babaian, RJ ;
Fritsche, H ;
Ayala, A ;
Bhadkamkar, V ;
Johnston, DA ;
Naccarato, W ;
Zhang, Z .
UROLOGY, 2000, 56 (06) :1000-1006
[3]   A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy [J].
Babaian, RJ ;
Toi, A ;
Kamoi, K ;
Troncoso, P ;
Sweet, J ;
Evans, R ;
Johnston, D ;
Chen, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (01) :152-157
[4]  
BOSTWICK DG, 1999, SEMIN UROL ONCOL, V17, P175
[5]   COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIAL OF 6,630 MEN [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
RICHIE, JP ;
AHMANN, FR ;
HUDSON, MA ;
SCARDINO, PT ;
FLANIGAN, RC ;
DEKERNION, JB ;
RATLIFF, TL ;
KAVOUSSI, LR ;
DALKIN, BL ;
WATERS, WB ;
MACFARLANE, MT ;
SOUTHWICK, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (05) :1283-1290
[6]   Novel artificial neural network for early detection of prostate cancer [J].
Djavan, B ;
Remzi, M ;
Zlotta, A ;
Seitz, C ;
Snow, P ;
Marberger, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (04) :921-929
[7]   Development of a nomogram that predicts the probability of a positive prostate biopsy in men with an abnormal digital rectal examination and a prostate-specific antigen between 0 and 4 ng/mL [J].
Eastham, JA ;
May, R ;
Robertson, JL ;
Sartor, O ;
Kattan, MW .
UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (04) :709-713
[8]  
Gamito E.J., 2003, PROSTATE CANCER, P167
[9]   Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for detection of prostate cancer [J].
Gore, JL ;
Shariat, SF ;
Miles, BJ ;
Kadmon, D ;
Jiang, N ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Slawin, KM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (05) :1554-1559
[10]   RANDOM SYSTEMATIC VERSUS DIRECTED ULTRASOUND GUIDED TRANS-RECTAL CORE BIOPSIES OF THE PROSTATE [J].
HODGE, KK ;
MCNEAL, JE ;
TERRIS, MK ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (01) :71-75