Reconfiguration: a key to handle exceptions and performance deteriorations in manufacturing operations

被引:22
作者
Bruccoleri, M
Renna, P
Perrone, G
机构
[1] Univ Palermo, Fac Engn, Dipartimento Tecnol Meccan Prod & Ingn Gest, I-90128 Palermo, Italy
[2] Univ Basilicata, Dipartimento Ingn & Fis Ambientale, I-85100 Potenza, Italy
关键词
reconfigurable manufacturing systems; exception handling; negotiation;
D O I
10.1080/00207540500140773
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
During a manufacturing operation, exceptions may occur dynamically and unpredictably. Their occurrence may lead to the degradation of system performance or, in the worst case scenario may interrupt the production process by causing errors in the schedule plan. This paper classifies three families of exceptions: ( 1) out- of- order events such as machine breakdowns, ( 2) operational out- of- ordinary events such as rush orders and ( 3) deteriorations of manufacturing resource performance such as reductions of machines' utilization. In all cases, in order to maintain an adequate level of system performance, it is necessary to detect exceptions, to diagnose them quickly and to recover them by taking corrective actions to avoid fault propagations. Decisions concerning how to deal with exceptions, i. e. which strategy to implement, depend on the manufacturing environment ( dedicated line,. flexible system, reconfigurable system or a mix of them) and the advantages arising from using a certain exception handling policy vary from one production system to another. The activity of reconfiguring manufacturing resources has been demonstrated to be a powerful operation strategy to handle machine breakdowns. This paper extends the concept of 'reconfiguration for exception handling' to other families of exceptions and proposes reconfiguration for their recovery. The reconfiguration process is handled by an agent- based control system that implements four negotiation processes among manufacturing resource agents.
引用
收藏
页码:4125 / 4145
页数:21
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Autonomous agents architectures and algorithms in flexible manufacturing systems [J].
Adacher, L ;
Agnetis, A ;
Meloni, C .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2000, 32 (10) :941-951
[2]  
AMICO M, 2001, P 5 CONV AITEM SEPT, P355
[3]  
[Anonymous], USING UML SOFTWARE E
[4]   Combining knowledge-based systems and simulation to solve rescheduling problems [J].
Belz, R ;
Mertens, P .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1996, 17 (02) :141-157
[5]  
Brandimarte P, 2000, IIE TRANS, V32, P921
[6]  
Bruccoleri M, 2003, INT J PROD RES, V41, P1393, DOI [10.1080/1352816031000075170, 10.1080/13528160310007510]
[7]  
Bruccoleri M, 2002, P 5 BIANN WORLD AUT, V3
[8]  
Bruccoleri M, 2002, P JUSFA 2002 JAP US, V3, P1067
[9]   REACTING TO SCHEDULING EXCEPTIONS IN FMS ENVIRONMENTS [J].
DUTTA, A .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1990, 22 (04) :300-314
[10]   Scheduling in job shops with machine breakdowns: an experimental study [J].
Holthaus, O .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 36 (01) :137-162