High-throughput tissue extraction protocol for NMR- and MS-based metabolomics

被引:509
作者
Wu, Huifeng [1 ]
Southam, Andrew D. [1 ]
Hines, Adam [1 ]
Viant, Mark R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
metabolomics; tissue; metabolite; extraction; NMR; MS; FT-ICR; liver; fish;
D O I
10.1016/j.ab.2007.10.002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In metabolomics, tissues typically are extracted by grinding in liquid nitrogen followed by the stepwise addition of solvents. This is time-consuming and difficult to automate, and the multiple steps can introduce variability. Here we optimize tissue extraction methods compatible with high-throughput, reproducible nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy- and mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics. Previously, we concluded that methanol/chloroform/water extraction is preferable for metabolomics, and we further optimized this here using fish liver and an automated Precellys 24 bead-based homogenizer, allowing rapid extraction of multiple samples without carryover. We compared three solvent addition strategies: stepwise, two-step, and all solvents simultaneously. Then we evaluated strategies for improved partitioning of metabolites between solvent phases, including the addition of extra water and different partition times. Polar extracts were analyzed by NMR and principal components analysis, and the two-step approach was preferable based on lipid partitioning, reproducibility, yield, and throughput. Longer partitioning or extra water increased yield and decreased lipids in the polar phase but caused metabolic decay in these extracts. Overall, we conclude that the two-step method with extra water provides good quality data but that the two-step method with 10 min partitioning provides a more accurate snapshot of the metabolome. Finally, when validating the two-step strategy using NMR and MS metabolomics, we showed that technical variability was considerably smaller than biological variability. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 212
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   CEPHALORIDINE-INDUCED NEPHROTOXICITY IN THE FISCHER-344 RAT - PROTON NMR SPECTROSCOPIC STUDIES OF URINE AND PLASMA IN RELATION TO CONVENTIONAL CLINICAL CHEMICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENTS OF NEPHRONAL DAMAGE [J].
ANTHONY, ML ;
GARTLAND, KPR ;
BEDDELL, CR ;
LINDON, JC ;
NICHOLSON, JK .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 66 (08) :525-537
[2]  
ANTHONY ML, 1994, ARCH TOXICOL, V68, P43
[3]   Highly-parallel metabolomics approaches using LC-MS2 for pharmaceutical and environmental analysis [J].
Bajad, Sunil ;
Shulaev, Vladimir .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 26 (06) :625-636
[4]  
BLIGH EG, 1959, CAN J BIOCHEM PHYS, V37, P911
[5]   Quantitative pathology in tissue MR spectroscopy based human prostate metabolomics [J].
Burns, MA ;
He, WL ;
Wu, CL ;
Cheng, LL .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2004, 3 (06) :591-598
[6]   Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics [J].
Dettmer, Katja ;
Aronov, Pavel A. ;
Hammock, Bruce D. .
MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS, 2007, 26 (01) :51-78
[7]   Metabolite profiling by one- and two-dimensional NMR analysis of complex mixtures [J].
Fan, WMT .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY, 1996, 28 (pt 2) :161-219
[8]   Metabolic profiling of genetic disorders:: A multitissue 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic and pattern recognition study into dystrophic tissue [J].
Griffin, JL ;
Williams, HJ ;
Sang, E ;
Clarke, K ;
Rae, C ;
Nicholson, JK .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 293 (01) :16-21
[9]   Comparison of histological, genetic, metabolomics, and lipid-based methods for sex determination in marine mussels [J].
Hines, Adam ;
Yeung, Wal Ho ;
Craft, John ;
Brown, Margaret ;
Kenned, Jill ;
Bignell, John ;
Stentiford, Grant D. ;
Viant, Mark R. .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2007, 369 (02) :175-186
[10]   Comparison of extraction methods for secologanin and the quantitative analysis of secologanin from Symphoricarpos albus using 1H-NMR [J].
Kim, HK ;
Choi, YH ;
Luijendijk, TJC ;
Rocha, RAV ;
Verpoorte, R .
PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS, 2004, 15 (04) :257-261