Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening 3 yr after release of national recommendations for screening

被引:82
作者
McGregor, S. Elizabeth [1 ]
Hilsden, Robert J.
Li, Feng X.
Bryant, Heather E.
Murray, Alison
机构
[1] Alberta Canc Board, Div Populat Hlth & Informat, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Dept Family Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01217.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: National guidelines recommending colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for average risk Canadians were released in 2001. The current study determined rates of CRC screening and predictors of screening 3 yr after the guidelines were released. Method: A population-based random digit dial telephone survey of 1,808 Alberta men and women aged 50-74 yr assessed awareness about, and self-reported rates of, screening. Results: More average risk women than men reported a recent screening with a home fecal occult blood test (FOBT) (14.0% vs 9.8%, P = 0.013) but men had slightly higher rates of screening endoscopy in the past 5 yr (4.3% vs 1.6%, P = 0.003). Overall, only 14.3% of average risk adults (N = 1,476) were up-to-date on CRC screening. Multivariable predictors of being up-to-date on CRC screening differed for men and women although a doctor's recommendation for screening was a strong predictor for both genders (men OR 5.0, 2.9-8.3, women OR 3.8, 2.3-6.5). Screening for other cancers was also an important predictor in both men and women. Conclusion: Three years after the release of national guidelines, rates of screening among average risk adults aged 50-74 yr were very low. Public education programs and primary care interventions to specifically invite average risk adults for screening may be required to increase CRC screening rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1727 / 1735
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Advisory Comm Canc Prevention, 2000, EUR J CANCER, V36, P1473
[2]  
*AM ASS PUBL OP RE, 2004, FIN DISP CAS COD OUT
[3]  
Anderson WF, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P1126
[4]   Practice Audit in Gastroenterology (PAGE) program: A novel approach to continuing professional development [J].
Armstrong, D ;
Hollingworth, R ;
Gardiner, T ;
Klassen, M ;
Smith, W ;
Hunt, RH ;
Barkun, A ;
Gould, M ;
Leddin, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 20 (06) :405-410
[5]   Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial [J].
Atkin, WS ;
Cook, CF ;
Cuzick, J ;
Edwards, R ;
Northover, JMA ;
Wardle, J .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9314) :1291-1300
[6]  
Balluz Lina, 2004, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V53, P1
[7]   Colorectal cancer screening in North Carolina: Associations with diabetes mellitus and demographic and health characteristics [J].
Bell, RA ;
Shelton, BJ ;
Paskett, ED .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 32 (02) :163-167
[8]   Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale [J].
Berg, AO ;
Allan, JD ;
Frame, PS ;
Homer, CJ ;
Johnson, MS ;
Klein, JD ;
Lieu, TA ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Orleans, CT ;
Peipert, JF ;
Pender, NJ ;
Siu, AL ;
Teutsch, SM ;
Westhoff, C ;
Woolf, SH .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 137 (02) :129-131
[9]  
Berry S, 1996, NEW ZEAL MED J, V109, P447
[10]  
*BOWEL CANC SCREEN, 2005, AUSTR BOWL CANC SCRE