Authors' reply to Allport and Kerler (2003)

被引:3
作者
Chin, WW
Salisbury, WD
Gopal, A
Newsted, PR
机构
[1] Univ Houston, CT Bauer Coll Business, Houston, TX 77204 USA
[2] Univ Dayton, MIS, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[3] Univ Dayton, OM, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[4] Univ Dayton, Dept Decis Sci, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Richard Ivey Sch Business, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[6] Athabasca Univ, Ctr Innovat Management, St Albert, AB T8N 1B4, Canada
关键词
structural equation modeling; confirmatory factor analysis; scale development;
D O I
10.1287/isre.14.4.360.24902
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
We are pleased that our effort has received such interest, and thank the editor for allowing us the opportunity to provide our thoughts regarding the questions raised by Allport and Kerler (A&K) in their research note (2003). A&K's paper has triggered a response on two fronts. The first concerns technical issues specific to our study (Salisbury et al. 2002), and the second is a more general question that would seem implicit in their paper: What is the appropriate balance between theory and data in scale development?
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 363
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条