Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults

被引:374
作者
Myles, PS [1 ]
Hunt, JO
Nightingale, CE
Fletcher, H
Beh, T
Tanil, D
Nagy, A
Rubinstein, A
Ponsford, JL
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Management, Prahran, Vic 3181, Australia
[2] Bethesda Hosp, Dept Psychol, Prahran, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
A variety of methods have been used to quantify aspects of recovery after anesthesia. Most are narrowly focused, are not patient-rated, and have not been validated. We therefore set out to develop a patient-rated quality of recovery score. We constructed a 61-item questionnaire that asked individuals (patients and relatives, medical and nursing staff; total n = 136) to rate various postoperative items describing features a patient may experience postoperatively. The most highly ranked items were included in a final nine-point index score, which we called the "QoR Score." We then studied two cohorts of surgical patients (n = 449). There was good convergent validity between the QoR Score and the visual analog scale score (rho = 0.55, P < 0.0001). Discriminant construct validity was supported by comparing resultant QoR Scores in patients undergoing day-stay, minor, and major surgery (P = 0.008), as well as a negative correlation with duration of hospital stay (rho = -0.20, P < 0.0001), and, using multivariate regression, demonstrating a significant negative relationship between QoR Score and female gender (P = 0.048) and older age (P = 0.041). There was also good interrater agreement (rho = 0.55, P < 0.0001), test-retest reliability (median rho = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and internal consistency (alpha = 0.57 and 0.90, P < 0.0001). There was a significant difference between the groups of patients recovering from major and minor surgery (P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that the QoR Score has good validity, reliability, and clinical acceptability in patients undergoing many types of surgery. Implications: We set out to develop a patient-rated quality of recovery score (QoR) that could be used both as a measure of outcome in perioperative trials and for clinical audit. We first surveyed patients and staff to identify important aspects of recovery, then developed a nine-point QoR Score. This was then compared with other measures of postoperative outcome. We found that the QoR Score is a useful measure of recovery after anesthesia and surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 90
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
[2]   Cost-effectiveness of inhalational, balanced and total intravenous anaesthesia for ambulatory knee surgery [J].
Alhashemi, JA ;
Miller, DR ;
OBrien, HV ;
Hull, KA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (02) :118-125
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, LANCET, V1, P1
[4]  
Campbell MJ, 1989, STATISTICS CONFIDENC, P71
[5]  
COHEN MM, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V78, P7
[6]  
COHEN MM, 1987, CANADIAN J ANAESTHES, V33, P22
[7]   Development of a measure of patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care - The Iowa satisfaction with anesthesia scale [J].
Dexter, F ;
Aker, J ;
Wright, WA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (04) :865-873
[8]  
FERELL BR, 1995, QUAL LIFE RES, V4, P523
[9]   MULTICENTER STUDY OF GENERAL-ANESTHESIA .2. RESULTS [J].
FORREST, JB ;
CAHALAN, MK ;
REHDER, K ;
GOLDSMITH, CH ;
LEVY, WJ ;
STRUNIN, L ;
BOTA, W ;
BOUCEK, CD ;
CUCCHIARA, RF ;
DHAMEE, S ;
DOMINO, KB ;
DUDMAN, AJ ;
HAMILTON, WK ;
KAMPINE, J ;
KOTRLY, KJ ;
MALTBY, JR ;
MAZLOOMDOOST, M ;
MACKENZIE, RA ;
MELNICK, BM ;
MOTOYAMA, E ;
MUIR, JJ ;
MUNSHI, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 72 (02) :262-268
[10]   A CRITICAL-APPRAISAL OF THE QUALITY OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASUREMENTS [J].
GILL, TM ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (08) :619-626