Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study

被引:937
作者
Freeman, ML
DiSario, JA
Nelson, DB
Fennerty, MB
Lee, JG
Bjorkman, DJ
Overby, CS
Aas, J
Ryan, ME
Bochna, GS
Shaw, MJ
Snady, HW
Erickson, RV
Moore, JP
Roel, JP
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
[2] Minneapolis Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Pk Nicollet Clin, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Duluth Clin, Duluth, MN USA
[5] Univ Utah, Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[6] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[7] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[8] Marshfield Clin Fdn Med Res & Educ, Marshfield, WI USA
[9] Rapid City Med Ctr, Rapid City, SD USA
[10] St Elizabeth Hosp, Hoboken, NJ USA
[11] Q&R Clin, Bismarck, ND USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mge.2001.117550
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Post-ERCP pancreatitis is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to comprehensively evaluate potential procedure- and patient-related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis over a wide spectrum of centers. Methods: Consecutive ERCP procedures were prospectively studied at 11 centers (6 private, 5 university). Complications were assessed at 30 days by using established consensus criteria. Results: Pancreatitis occurred after 131 (6.7%) of 1963 consecutive ERCP procedures (mild 70, moderate 55, severe 6). By univariate analysis, 23 of 32 investigated variables were significant. Multivariate risk factors with adjusted odds ratios (OR) were prior ERCP-induced pancreatitis (OR 5.4), suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (OR 2.6), female gender (OR 2.5), normal serum bilirubin (OR 1.9), absence of chronic pancreatitis (OR 1.9), biliary sphincter balloon dilation (OR 4.5), difficult cannulation (OR 3.4), pancreatic sphincterotomy (OR 3.1), and 1 or more injections of contrast into the pancreatic duct (OR 2.7). Small bile duct diameter, sphincter of Oddi manometry, biliary sphincterotomy, and lower ERCP case volume were not multivariate risk factors for pancreatitis, although endoscopists performing on average more than 2 ERCPs per week had significantly greater success at bile duct cannulation (96.5% versus 91.5%, p = 0.0001). Combinations of patient characteristics including female gender, normal serum bilirubin, recurrent abdominal pain, and previous post-ERCP pancreatitis placed patients at increasingly higher risk of pancreatitis, regardless of whether ERCP was diagnostic, manometric, or therapeutic. Conclusions: Patient-related factors are as important as procedure-related factors in determining risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis. These data emphasize the importance of careful patient selection as well as choice of technique in the avoidance of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 434
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alnounou M, 1999, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V49, pAB70
[2]   Pharmacologic treatment can prevent pancreatic injury after ERCP: a meta-analysis [J].
Andriulli, A ;
Leandro, G ;
Niro, G ;
Mangia, A ;
Festa, V ;
Gambassi, G ;
Villani, MR ;
Facciorusso, D ;
Conoscitore, P ;
Spirito, F ;
De Maio, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (01) :1-7
[3]   Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bileduct stones [J].
Bergman, JJGHM ;
Rauws, EAJ ;
Fockens, P ;
vanBerkel, AM ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Tijssen, JGP ;
Tytgat, GNJ ;
Huibregtse, K .
LANCET, 1997, 349 (9059) :1124-1129
[4]   What is the current status of endoscopic balloon dilation for stone removal? [J].
Bergman, JJGHM ;
Huibregtse, K .
ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (01) :43-45
[5]   Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type pre-cut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation [J].
Binmoeller, KF ;
Seifert, H ;
Gerke, H ;
Seitz, U ;
Portis, M ;
Soehendra, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (06) :689-695
[6]  
Bjorkman DJ, 1996, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V91, P1485
[7]   ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLOTOMY FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES - FACTORS INFLUENCING THE COMPLICATION RATE [J].
BOENDER, J ;
NIX, GAJJ ;
DERIDDER, MAJ ;
VANBLANKENSTEIN, M ;
SCHUTTE, HE ;
DEES, J ;
WILSON, JHP .
ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 26 (02) :209-216
[8]  
CHEN YK, 1994, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V89, P327
[9]   THE RISK OF DETERMINING RISK WITH MULTIVARIABLE MODELS [J].
CONCATO, J ;
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
HOLFORD, TR .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (03) :201-210
[10]   PRECUT PAPILLOTOMY - A RISKY TECHNIQUE FOR EXPERTS ONLY [J].
COTTON, PB .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1989, 35 (06) :578-579