Interarm differences in seated systolic and diastolic blood pressure: the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network study

被引:32
作者
Arnett, DK
Tang, WH
Province, MA
Oberman, A
Ellison, RC
Morgan, D
Eckfeldt, JH
Hunt, SC
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Div Epidemiol & Commun Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Div Biostat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Div Prevent Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Prevent Med & Epidemiol Sect, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] Univ Minnesota Hosp & Clin, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[7] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
hypertension; oscillometric blood pressure measurement; bias; interarm difference;
D O I
10.1097/01.hjh.0000170376.23461.f7
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective To examine whether blood pressure (BP) differs between arms in hypertensive siblings and randomly selected volunteers, and whether this difference is explained by cardiovascular risk factors. Methods The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network recruited 2395 hypertensive siblings and 854 volunteers. BP was measured six times (three measurements per arm) in seated participants using a Dinamap monitor. The average of three measurements was calculated per arm and the difference taken between arms (i.e. interarm BP differences). Results The mean age of the subjects was 56 years, and about one-half of the sample was male. More than one-half of the sample was African-American. The mean diastolic BP was equal in the two arms in the random sample (68.8 versus 68.7 mmHg) and in hypertensive siblings (73.4 versus 73.1 mmHg), as was systolic BP (random, 119.6 versus 119.3 mmHg; hypertensives, 130.8 versus 130.7 mmHg). The mean interarm diastolic and systolic BP differences were 2.96 +/- 2.51 and 4.61 +/- 4.10 mmHg, respectively, in the random sample and were 3.09 +/- 2.73 and 5.35 +/- 4.98 mmHg, respectively, in hypertensive siblings. Few (random, 1.6%; hypertensives, 2.8%) had interarm diastolic BP differences > 10 mmHg, but 9.2% of the random sample and 14.2% of hypertensive siblings had systolic BP differences > 10 mmHg. Obesity, higher heart rate, and higher systolic BP were associated with larger interarm BP differences. These results have implications for blood pressure measurement in research settings and in screening programs. (c) 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:1141 / 1147
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Amsterdam B, 1943, NY STATE J MED, V43, P2294
[2]   A study of inter-arm blood pressure differences in primary care [J].
Cassidy, P ;
Jones, K .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2001, 15 (08) :519-522
[3]   Unilateral alterations in blood-pressure : The differential blood- pressure sign - Second communication [J].
Cyriax, EF .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1921, 14 (56) :309-313
[4]   AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN SIMULTANEOUS INTERARM BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS [J].
FOTHERBY, MD ;
PANAYIOTOU, B ;
POTTER, JF .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 69 (809) :194-196
[5]   How many sphygmomanometric cuff inflations are necessary to obtain a hemodynamic baseline? [J].
Goodman, M ;
Dembroski, TM ;
Herbst, JH .
BIOFEEDBACK AND SELF-REGULATION, 1996, 21 (03) :207-216
[6]   IS THE BLOOD-PRESSURE THE SAME IN BOTH ARMS [J].
GOULD, BA ;
HORNUNG, RS ;
KIESO, HA ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
RAFTERY, EB .
CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 1985, 8 (08) :423-426
[7]   BILATERAL INDIRECT AND DIRECT ARTERIAL PRESSURES [J].
HARRISON, EG ;
ROTH, GM ;
HINES, EA .
CIRCULATION, 1960, 22 (03) :419-436
[8]  
HASHIMOTO F, 1984, WESTERN J MED, V141, P189
[9]  
KRISTENSEN BO, 1982, ACTA MED SCAND, P69
[10]   Inter-arm differences in blood pressure: when are they clinically significant? [J].
Lane, D ;
Beevers, M ;
Barnes, N ;
Bourne, J ;
John, A ;
Malins, S ;
Beevers, DG .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 20 (06) :1089-1095