Identification of promoter motifs involved in the network of phytochrome A-regulated gene expression by combined analysis of genomic sequence and microarray data

被引:197
作者
Hudson, ME
Quail, PH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Plant & Microbial Biol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, USDA, Ctr Plant Gene Express, Albany, CA 94710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1104/pp.103.030437
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Several hundred Arabidopsis genes, transcriptionally regulated by phytochrome A (phyA), were previously identified using an oligonucleotide microarray. We have now identified, in silico, conserved sequence motifs in the promoters of these genes by comparing the promoter sequences to those of all the genes present on the microarray from which they were sampled. This was done using a Perl script (called Sift) that identifies over-represented motifs using an enumerative approach. The utility of Sift was verified by analysis of circadian-regulated promoters known to contain a biologically significant motif. Several elements were then identified in phyA-responsive promoters by their over-representation. Five previously undescribed motifs were detected in the promoters of phyA-induced genes. Four novel motifs were found in phyA-repressed promoters, plus a motif that strongly resembles the DE1 element. The G-box, CACGTG, was a prominent hit in both induced and repressed phyA-responsive promoters. Intriguingly, two distinct flanking consensus sequences were observed adjacent to the G-box core sequence: one predominating in phyA-induced promoters, the other in phyA-repressed promoters. Such different conserved flanking nucleotides around the core motif in these two sets of promoters may indicate that different members of the same family of DNA-binding proteins mediate phyA induction and repression. An increased abundance of G-box sequences was observed in the most rapidly phyA-responsive genes and in the promoters of phyA-regulated transcription factors, indicating that G-box-binding transcription factors are upstream components in a transcriptional cascade that mediates phyA-regulated development.
引用
收藏
页码:1605 / 1616
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Evolution of light-regulated plant promoters [J].
Argüello-Astorga, G ;
Herrera-Estrella, L .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 49 :525-555
[2]   Ancestral multipartite units in light-responsive plant promoters have structural features correlating with specific phototransduction pathways [J].
ArguelloAstorga, GR ;
HerreraEstrella, LR .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 112 (03) :1151-1166
[3]   DISSECTION OF THE FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE OF A PLANT DEFENSE GENE PROMOTER USING A HOMOLOGOUS INVITRO TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SYSTEM [J].
ARIAS, JA ;
DIXON, RA ;
LAMB, CJ .
PLANT CELL, 1993, 5 (04) :485-496
[4]   A NEGATIVELY ACTING DNA-SEQUENCE ELEMENT MEDIATES PHYTOCHROME-DIRECTED REPRESSION OF PHYA GENE-TRANSCRIPTION [J].
BRUCE, WB ;
DENG, XW ;
QUAIL, PH .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1991, 10 (10) :3015-3024
[5]   Arabidopsis bZIP protein HY5 directly interacts with light-responsive promoters in mediating light control of gene expression [J].
Chattopadhyay, S ;
Ang, LH ;
Puente, P ;
Deng, XW ;
Wei, N .
PLANT CELL, 1998, 10 (05) :673-683
[6]   MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT WITH HIERARCHICAL-CLUSTERING [J].
CORPET, F .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1988, 16 (22) :10881-10890
[7]   Closing the circadian loop:: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim [J].
Darlington, TK ;
Wager-Smith, K ;
Ceriani, MF ;
Staknis, D ;
Gekakis, N ;
Steeves, TDL ;
Weitz, CJ ;
Takahashi, JS ;
Kay, SA .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5369) :1599-1603
[8]   THE ARABIDOPSIS PHYTOCHROME-A GENE HAS MULTIPLE TRANSCRIPTION START SITES AND A PROMOTER SEQUENCE MOTIF HOMOLOGOUS TO THE REPRESSOR ELEMENT OF MONOCOT PHYTOCHROME-A GENES [J].
DEHESH, K ;
FRANCI, C ;
SHARROCK, RA ;
SOMERS, DE ;
WELSCH, JA ;
QUAIL, PH .
PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY, 1994, 59 (03) :379-384
[9]  
Fairchild CD, 2000, GENE DEV, V14, P2377
[10]   Transcriptional regulatory networks and the yeast cell cycle [J].
Futcher, B .
CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2002, 14 (06) :676-683