Applicability of American and British criteria for screening of the retinopathy of prematurity in Thailand

被引:34
作者
Trinavarat, A
Atchaneeyasakul, LO
Udompunturak, S
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Siriraj Hosp, Off Res Dev & Promot, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
关键词
retinopathy of prematurity (ROP); screening criteria;
D O I
10.1007/s10384-003-0014-2
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to verify the applicability of standard guidelines for the screening of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and to determine the appropriate criteria for Thai neonates. Methods: Records of ROP screening of infants born in our hospital between 1995 and 2000 with a birth weight below 2000g or a gestational age of less than 36 weeks were studied. Criteria to screen infants with a birth weight below 1500g or a gestational age of less than 28 weeks in the American guidelines and similar birth weight but a gestational age of less than 31 weeks in the British recommended guidelines were applied and evaluated in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Criteria reaching 100% sensitivity with the maximum specificity were deemed appropriate. Results: Of the 514 screened infants, 33 had developed stage 2+ ROP and beyond. The mean +/- SD birth weight and gestational age were 1046 +/- 257 (710-1680g) and 29.2 +/- 2.5 weeks (24-35 weeks), respectively. The age at intervention was 6-16 weeks. Sensitivity for both American and British guidelines was 93.9%. By screening infants with birth weights below 1500g or gestational age less than 33 weeks, we could achieve 100% sensitivity with 18.3% specificity. We decided that the initial examination should be performed 4-6 weeks after birth. By applying these criteria to 62 referred cases we also were able to include in the screening all cases of concern in this group. Conclusions: Regional criteria for ROP screening is required and should be evaluated periodically and modified accordingly. (C) Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2004.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 53
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Changing profile of retinopathy of prematurity [J].
Aggarwal, R ;
Deorari, AK ;
Azad, RV ;
Kumar, H ;
Talwar, D ;
Sethi, A ;
Paul, VK .
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2002, 48 (04) :239-242
[2]  
Bull MJ, 2001, PEDIATRICS, V107, P1480
[3]   A comparison of laser photocoagulation with cryotherapy for threshold retinopathy of prematurity at 10 years - Part 2. Refractive outcome [J].
Connolly, BP ;
Ng, EYJ ;
McNamara, JA ;
Regillo, CD ;
Vander, JF ;
Tasman, W .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (05) :936-941
[4]  
*CR RET PREM COOP, 2002, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V120, P595
[5]  
Elsas FJ, 2001, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V119, P1110
[6]  
GARNER A, 1984, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V102, P1130
[7]   Are we screening too many babies for retinopathy of prematurity? [J].
Goble, RR ;
Jones, HS ;
Fielder, AR .
EYE, 1997, 11 (4) :509-514
[8]   Surgical results and visual outcomes of vitreous surgery for advanced stages of retinopathy of prematurity [J].
Kono, T ;
Oshima, K ;
Fuchino, Y .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 44 (06) :661-667
[9]   Evidence for changing guidelines for routine screening for retinopathy of prematurity [J].
Lee, SK ;
Normand, C ;
McMillan, D ;
Ohlsson, A ;
Vincer, M ;
Lyons, C .
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2001, 155 (03) :387-395
[10]   Retinopathy of prematurity: are we screening too many babies? [J].
Mathew, M ;
Fern, A ;
Hill, R .
EYE, 2002, 16 (05) :538-542