A multilayer model for inferring dry deposition using standard meteorological measurements

被引:172
作者
Meyers, TP
Finkelstein, P
Clarke, J
Ellestad, TG
Sims, PF
机构
[1] NOAA, ERL, Air Resources Lab, Atmospher Turbulence & Diffus Div, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] NOAA, ERL, Air Resources Lab, Atmospher Modelling Div, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[3] US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/98JD01564
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
rn this paper, we describe the latest version of the dry deposition inferential model, which is used to estimate the deposition velocities (V-d) for SO2, O-3, HNO3, and particles with diameters less than 2 mu m. The dry deposition networks operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) use this model to estimate dry deposition on a weekly basis. This model uses a multilayer approach, discretizing the vegetated canopy into 20 layers. The use of canopy radiative transfer and simple wind profile models allows for estimates of stomatal (r(s)) and leaf boundary layer (r(b)) resistances to be determined at each layer in the plant canopy for both sunlit and shaded leaves. The effect of temperature, water stress, and vapor pressure deficits on the stomatal resistance (r(s)) have been included. Comparisons of modeled deposition velocities are made with extensive direct measurements performed at three different locations with different crops. The field experiment is discussed in some detail. Overall, modeled O-3 deposition velocities are in good agreement with measured values with the average mean bias for all surfaces of the order of 0.01 cm/s or less. For SO2, mean biases range from -0.05 for corn to 0.15 cm/s for soybeans, while for HNO3, they range from 0.09 for corn to 0.47 cm/s for pasture.
引用
收藏
页码:22645 / 22661
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Bendat J. S., 1966, MEASUREMENT ANAL RAN
[3]  
BUSINGER JA, 1986, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V25, P1100, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<1100:EOTAWW>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]   ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATIONS AND THE DEPOSITION VELOCITY TO SNOW OF NITRIC-ACID, SULFUR-DIOXIDE AND VARIOUS PARTICULATE SPECIES [J].
CADLE, SH ;
DASCH, JM ;
MULAWA, PA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1985, 19 (11) :1819-1827
[6]   BOUNDARY-LAYER RESISTANCES OF ARTIFICIAL LEAVES IN TURBULENT AIR .2. LEAVES INCLINED TO THE MEAN FLOW [J].
CHEN, JM ;
IBBETSON, A ;
MILFORD, JR .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1988, 45 (04) :371-390
[7]   BOUNDARY-LAYER RESISTANCES OF ARTIFICIAL LEAVES IN TURBULENT AIR .1. LEAVES PARALLEL TO THE MEAN FLOW [J].
CHEN, JM ;
IBBETSON, A ;
MILFORD, JR .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1988, 45 (1-2) :137-156
[8]  
CIONCO R M, 1972, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, V3, P255, DOI 10.1007/BF02033923
[9]   Dry deposition calculations for the clean air status and trends network [J].
Clarke, JF ;
Edgerton, ES ;
Martin, BE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 31 (21) :3667-3678
[10]   A MICROMETEOROLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF SURFACE EXCHANGE PARAMETERS OVER HEATHLAND [J].
ERISMAN, JW ;
DUYZER, J .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1991, 57 (1-2) :115-128