Examining the driving forces for improving China's CO2 emission intensity using the decomposing method

被引:149
作者
Tan, Zhongfu [2 ]
Li, Li [1 ]
Wang, Jianjun [2 ]
Wang, Jianhui [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] N China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[3] Argonne Natl Lab, Decis & Informat Sci Div, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Decomposition; CO2 emission intensity; LMDI; Electric power industry; China; ENERGY-USE; STRUCTURAL DECOMPOSITION; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.042
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper examines the driving forces for reducing China's CO2 emission intensity between 1998 and 2008, utilizing the logarithmic mean divisia index (LMDI) technique. By first grouping the CO2 emissions into two categories, those arising from activities related to the electric power industry and those from other sources, emission intensity is further broken down into the effects of the CO2 emission coefficient, energy intensity of power generation, power generation and consumption ratio, electricity intensity of the gross domestic product (GDP), provincial structural change, and the energy intensity of the GDP for other activities. The decomposition results show that improvements in the energy intensity of power generation, electricity intensity of GDP, and energy intensity of GDP for other activities were mainly responsible for the success in reducing China's CO2 emission intensity and that activities related to the electric power industry played a key role. It is also revealed that performance varied significantly at the individual province level. The provinces with higher emission levels contributed the most to China's improvements in CO2 emission intensity. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4496 / 4504
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Liu, Na .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) :238-246
[2]   Accounting frameworks for tracking energy efficiency trends [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Mu, A. R. ;
Zhou, P. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (05) :1209-1219
[3]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, CHIN STAT YB
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CHIN STAT YB
[6]   Changes in the GHG emission intensity in EU-15: Lessons from a decomposition analysis [J].
Bhattacharyya, Subhes C. ;
Matsumura, Wataru .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (08) :3315-3322
[7]  
CEC,, 2009, CHIN EL POW IND STAT
[8]  
CEC-China Electricity Council, 1999, CHIN EL POW IND STAT
[9]  
Diakoulaki D, 2006, ENERGY, V31, P2638, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2005.11.024
[10]   Decomposition analysis of CO2 emission intensity between oilproducing and non-oll-producing sub-Saharan African countries [J].
Ebohon, Obas John ;
Ikeme, Anthony Jekwu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (18) :3599-3611