Transit-oriented development's ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies

被引:196
作者
Cervero, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept City & Reg Planning, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE | 2007年 / 39卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1068/a38377
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Transit-oriented development is shown to produce an appreciable ridership bonus in California. This is partly due to residential self-selection-that is, a lifestyle preference for transit-oriented living-as well as factors like employer-based policies that reduce free parking and automobile subsidies. Half-mile catchments of station areas appear to be indifference zones in the sense that residents generally ride transit regardless of local urban design attributes. Out-of-neighborhood attributes, like job accessibility and street connectivity at the destination, on the other hand, have a significant bearing on transit usage among station-area residents. The presence of self-selection, shown using nested logit modeling, underscores the importance of removing barriers to residential mobility so that households are able to sort themselves, via the marketplace, to locations well served by transit. Market-responsive zoning, flexible residential parking policies, location efficient mortgages, and adaptive reuse of parking lots are also promising tools for expanding the supply of transit-based housing.
引用
收藏
页码:2068 / 2085
页数:18
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Alonso, 2013, LOCATION LAND USE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, TRANSIT METROPOLIS G
[4]  
Bernick M., 1997, Transit villages in the 21st century
[5]  
Boarnet MarlonGary., 2001, Travel by Design the Influence of Urban Form on Travel
[6]   Public finance and transit-oriented planning: New evidence from southern California [J].
Boarnet, MG ;
Crane, R .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 1998, 17 (03) :206-219
[7]  
Calthorpe P., 1993, The next American metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream
[8]  
CERVERO R, 2002, RES RESULTS DIGEST, V52
[9]  
Cervero R., 1994, TRANSPORT POLICY, V1, P174, DOI DOI 10.1016/0967-070X(94)90013-2
[10]  
CERVERO R, 1996, J PUBLIC TRANSPORT, V1, P103