Comparing the German versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Deu) and the Child Behavior Checklist

被引:326
作者
Klasen, H
Woerner, W
Wolke, D
Meyer, R
Overmeyer, S
Kaschnitz, W
Rothenberger, A
Goodman, R
机构
[1] Inst Psychiat, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, London SE5 8AZ, England
[2] St Georges Med Sch, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, London SW17 0RE, England
[3] Univ Gottingen, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[4] Univ Hertfordshire, Dept Psychol, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
[5] Univ Jena, Kinder & Jugendpsychiat Klin, D-07740 Jena, Germany
[6] Graz Univ, Klin Kinder Jugendheilkunde, Klin Abt Allgemein Padiat, A-8036 Graz, Austria
关键词
child psychopathology; psychometrics; questionnaires; validity; German;
D O I
10.1007/s007870070030
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire that can be completed in about 5 minutes by the parents and teachers of 4-16 year olds. The scores of the English version correlate well with those of the considerably longer Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). The present study compares the German versions of the questionnaires. Both SDQ and CBCL were completed by the parents of 273 children drawn from psychiatric clinics (N = 163) and from a community sample (N = 110). The children from the community sample also filled in the SDQ self-report and the Youth Self Report (YSR). The children from the clinic sample received an ICD-IO diagnosis if applicable. Scores from the parent and self-rated SDQ and CBCL/YSR were highly correlated and equally able to distinguish between the community and clinic samples, with the SDQ showing significantly better results regarding the total scores. They were also equally able to distinguish between disorders within the clinic sample, the only significant difference being that the SDQ was better able to differentiate between children with and without hyperactivity-inattention. The study shows that like the English originals, the SDQ-Deu and the German CBCL are equally valid for most clinical and research purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 276
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Achenbach T., 1991, Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile
[2]  
Achenbach T. M., 1991, CHILDHOOD BEHAV CHEC
[3]  
Achenbach T.M., 1991, INTEGRATIVE GUIDE 19
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Modelling covariances and latent variables using EQS
[5]  
[Anonymous], KINDH ENTWICKL
[6]  
*ARB DTSCH CHILD B, 1998, ELTERNFRAGEBOGEN JUG
[7]   Behavior problems of children and adolescents in Germany, the Netherlands and the united states. A cross-cultural study with the child behavior checklist [J].
Dopfner, M ;
Schmeck, K ;
Poustka, F ;
Berner, W ;
Lehmkuhl, G ;
Verhulst, F .
NERVENARZT, 1996, 67 (11) :960-967
[8]  
Dopfner M, 1997, Z KINDER JUG-PSYCH, V25, P218
[9]  
Goodman R, 1999, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V40, P791, DOI 10.1017/S0021963099004096
[10]   The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A pilot study on the validity of the self-report version [J].
Goodman, R ;
Meltzer, H ;
Bailey, V .
EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 7 (03) :125-130