Prediction of solvation free energies of small organic molecules: Additive-constitutive models based on molecular fingerprints and atomic constants

被引:57
作者
Viswanadhan, VN
Ghose, AK
Singh, UC
Wendoloski, JJ
机构
[1] Amgen Inc, Dept Mol Struct & Design, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[2] AM Technol Inc, San Antonio, TX 78216 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES | 1999年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci980154m
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Solvation free energy is an important molecular characteristic useful in drug discovery because it represents the desolvation cost of a ligand binding to a receptor. Most of the recent developments in the estimation of solvation free energy require the use of molecular mechanics and dynamics calculations. Group contribution methods have been rarely used in the past for calculating salvation free energy because automated prediction methods have not been developed in this regard. As an aid to combinatorial library design, we explored rapid and accurate means of computing salvation free energies from the covalent structures of organic molecules and compared the results on a test set with the GB/SA solvation model.. Two independent additive-constitutive QSPR methods have been developed for the computation of solvation free energy. The first is a QSPR model (HLOGS) derived using a technique that uses the counts of distinct/similar fragments and substructures for each molecule as variables in a PLS regression. The second method (ALOGS) uses an extensive atom classification scheme developed earlier for the calculation of Log P. A database of 265 molecules with experimentally determined salvation free energies is used to derive the HLOGS (r = 0.97; rms = 0.58) and ALOGS (r = 0.98; rms = 0.38) models, which were then tested on 27 molecules not present in the training set. A detailed comparison of the HLOGS, ALOGS, GB/SA (with AMBER* and OPLSA* potentials) on the test set showed that the HLOGS and ALOGS models give better results than the GB/SA model. Among the three methods tested, the ALOGS method gives the best result on the test set (r = 0.96; rms = 0.86), though the parametrization for this method is incomplete as many atom types are undetermined due to their absence in the current training set. The HLOGS method appears to handle intramolecular interactions better than the ALOGS method.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 412
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
*A M TECHN INC, 1997, GAL 2 3 MOL MOD SOFT
[2]   Multiple-component condensation strategies for combinatorial library synthesis [J].
Armstrong, RW ;
Combs, AP ;
Tempest, PA ;
Brown, SD ;
Keating, TA .
ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 29 (03) :123-131
[3]  
BARNARD JM, 1995, DESCRIPTOR PACKAGE 3
[4]   THE MISSING TERM IN EFFECTIVE PAIR POTENTIALS [J].
BERENDSEN, HJC ;
GRIGERA, JR ;
STRAATSMA, TP .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1987, 91 (24) :6269-6271
[5]   NEURAL NETWORK STUDIES .1. ESTIMATION OF THE AQUEOUS SOLUBILITY OF ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS [J].
BODOR, N ;
HARGET, A ;
HUANG, MJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1991, 113 (25) :9480-9483
[6]   DETERMINING ATOM-CENTERED MONOPOLES FROM MOLECULAR ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS - THE NEED FOR HIGH SAMPLING DENSITY IN FORMAMIDE CONFORMATIONAL-ANALYSIS [J].
BRENEMAN, CM ;
WIBERG, KB .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1990, 11 (03) :361-373
[7]   A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules (vol 117, pg 5179, 1995) [J].
Cornell, WD ;
Cieplak, P ;
Bayly, CI ;
Gould, IR ;
Merz, KM ;
Ferguson, DM ;
Spellmeyer, DC ;
Fox, T ;
Caldwell, JW ;
Kollman, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1996, 118 (09) :2309-2309
[8]   COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR-FIELD ANALYSIS (COMFA) .1. EFFECT OF SHAPE ON BINDING OF STEROIDS TO CARRIER PROTEINS [J].
CRAMER, RD ;
PATTERSON, DE ;
BUNCE, JD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 110 (18) :5959-5967
[9]  
Crippen G.M., 1988, DISTANCE GEOMETRY MO
[10]   SOLVATION ENERGY IN PROTEIN FOLDING AND BINDING [J].
EISENBERG, D ;
MCLACHLAN, AD .
NATURE, 1986, 319 (6050) :199-203