A subgroup analysis of working memory in children with reading disabilities: Domain-general or domain-specific deficiency?

被引:67
作者
Swanson, HL [1 ]
Sachse-Lee, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Sch Educ, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/002221940103400305
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether changes in working memory (WM) of children with reading disabilities (RD) were related to a domain-specific or a domain-general system. Based on Daneman and Carpenter's (1980) Sentence Listening Span task, children were subgrouped into a group of high executive processing (high listening span) children without RD, a group of low executive processing (low listening span) children with RD, and a group of children with and without RD matched on executive processing (moderate listening span). Subgroups were compared on phonological, visual-spatial, and semantic WM tasks across initial (no probes or cues), gain (cues that bring: performance to an asymptotic level), and maintenance conditions (asymptotic conditions without cues). The results showed that (a) children without RD high in executive processing ability outperformed all other subgroups, (b) the RD subgroup low in executive processing performed poorly relative to all other subgroups across task and memory conditions, (c) children with and without RD matched on executive processing were comparable in WM span and changes in WM for all tasks, and (d) WM performance of children with RD was a strong linear function of the high executive processing group, suggesting that the nature or the specific componential makeup of the tasks are not the main contributors to WM performance. Taken together, the results suggest that a domain-general system may partially contribute to poor WM in children with RD, and that this system may operate independently of their reading deficits.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 263
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1977, FED REG
[2]   Exploring the central executive [J].
Baddeley, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (01) :5-28
[3]   IS WORKING MEMORY WORKING - THE 15TH BARTLETT LECTURE [J].
BADDELEY, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 44 (01) :1-31
[4]  
Baddeley A., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[5]  
Baddeley A.D., 1990, HUMAN MEMORY
[6]  
Baddeley A.D., 1999, Models of Working Memory, P28, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174909.005
[7]  
BRAINERD CJ, 1993, EMERGING THEMES COGN, V1, P50
[8]  
Brinley J.F., 1965, BEHAV AGING NERVOUS, P114
[9]   WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY AS LONG-TERM-MEMORY ACTIVATION - AN INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES APPROACH [J].
CANTOR, J ;
ENGLE, RW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1993, 19 (05) :1101-1114
[10]   Working memory, inhibitory control, and reading disability [J].
Chiappe, P ;
Hasher, L ;
Siegel, LS .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (01) :8-17