How should we measure informed choice? The case of cancer screening

被引:82
作者
Jepson, RG
Hewison, J
Thompson, AGH
Weller, D
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Div Community Hlth Sci Gen Practice, Edinburgh EH8 9DX, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Acad Unit Psychiat & Behav Sci, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Social & Polit Studies, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jme.2003.005793
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Informed choice is increasingly recognised as important in supporting patient autonomy and ensuring that people are neither deceived nor coerced. In cancer screening the emphasis has shifted away from just promoting the benefits of screening to providing comprehensive information to enable people to make an informed choice. Cancer screening programmes in the UK now have policies in place which state that it is their responsibility to ensure that individuals are making an individual informed choice. There is a need to evaluate whether such policies mean that those people invited for screening are making informed choices, and how comprehensive information affects other variables such as uptake, cost effectiveness, and satisfaction. At the present time, there is no validated measure of informed choice in cancer screening. Such a measure could be used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase informed choice and levels of informed choice in a population invited for screening. It could encourage health professionals to be accountable. Factors important when measuring informed choice in cancer screening include an individual's understanding of the limitations of screening, the ability to make an autonomous choice, and the difference between choice and behaviour.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 196
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Theories in health care and research - Theories of consent [J].
Alderson, P ;
Goodey, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7168) :1313-1315
[2]   Bridging the knowledge gap and communicating uncertainties for informed consent in cervical cytology screening; we need unbiased information and a culture change [J].
Anderson, CM ;
Nottingham, J .
CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 10 (04) :221-228
[3]  
[Anonymous], SEEK PAT CONS ETH CO
[4]  
[Anonymous], EVIDENCE BASED PATIE
[5]   Gaining informed consent for screening [J].
Austoker, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212) :722-723
[6]  
BEKKER H, 1999, HLTH TECHNOLOGY ASSE, V3, P156
[7]   Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer [J].
Davison, BJ ;
Kirk, P ;
Degner, LF ;
Hassard, TH .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1999, 37 (03) :255-263
[8]   Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review [J].
Edwards, A ;
Unigwe, S ;
Elwyn, G ;
Hood, K .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7417) :703-707
[9]   Developing professional ability to involve patients in their care: pull or push? [J].
Edwards, A ;
Elwyn, G .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2001, 10 (03) :129-130
[10]  
Elwyn G, 2001, EVIDENCE BASED PATIE, P119