Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: Influence of chemistry, phase, and topography

被引:97
作者
Price, RL
Gutwein, LG
Kaledin, L
Tepper, F
Webster, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Argonide Corp, Sanford, FL 32777 USA
关键词
osteoblast; alumina; orthopedic; nanophase materials; in vitro studies;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.a.20011
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Alumina is a material that has been used in both dental and orthopedic applications. It is with these uses in mind that osteoblast (bone-forming cell) function on alumina of varying particulate size, chemistry, and phase was tested in order to determine what formulation might be the most beneficial for bone regeneration. Specifically, in vitro osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, intracellular alkaline phosphatase activity, and calcium deposition was observed on delta-phase nanospherical, alpha-phase conventional spherical, and boehmite nanofiber alumina. Results showed for the first time increased osteoblast functions on the nanofiber alumina. Specifically, a 16% increase in osteoblast adhesion over nanophase spherical alumina and a 97% increase over conventional spherical alumina were found for nanofiber alumina after 2 h. A 29% increase in cell number after 5 days and up to a 57% greater amount of calcium was found on the surface of the nanofiber alumina compared with other alumina surfaces. Some of the possible explanations for such enhanced osteoblast behavior on nanofiber alumina may be attributed to chemistry, crystalline phase, and topography. Increased osteoblast function on nanofiber alumina suggests that it may be an ideal material for use in orthopedic and dental applications. (C) 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1284 / 1293
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Anderson James M., 1996, P165
[2]   Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials [J].
Anselme, K .
BIOMATERIALS, 2000, 21 (07) :667-681
[3]   The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of TiAl6V4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behaviour [J].
Anselme, K ;
Linez, P ;
Bigerelle, M ;
Le Maguer, D ;
Le Maguer, A ;
Hardouin, P ;
Hildebrand, HF ;
Iost, A ;
Leroy, JM .
BIOMATERIALS, 2000, 21 (15) :1567-1577
[4]  
Dee KC, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V40, P371, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980605)40:3<371::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-C
[6]   Osteoblast population migration characteristics on substrates modified with immobilized adhesive peptides [J].
Dee, KC ;
Andersen, TT ;
Bizios, R .
BIOMATERIALS, 1999, 20 (03) :221-227
[7]  
FORD Q, 1998, CERAM IND, P31
[8]  
GIGLIO ED, 2000, J BIOMAT SCI-POLYM E, V11, P1073
[9]  
GUTWEIN LG, 2003, IN PRESS 26 ANN AM C
[10]  
Hamadouche M, 2000, J BIOMED MATER RES, V52, P422, DOI 10.1002/1097-4636(200011)52:2<422::AID-JBM24>3.0.CO