Clinical trial designs for prospective validation of biomarkers

被引:34
作者
Mandrekar, SJ
Grothey, A
Goetz, MP
Sargent, DJ
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Oncol, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Biostat, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00129785-200505050-00004
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Traditionally, anatomic staging systems have been used to determine predictions of individual patient outcome and, to a lesser extent, guide the choice of treatment in patients with cancer. With new targeted therapies, the role of biomarkers is increasingly promising, suggesting an integrated approach using the genetic make-up of the tumor and the genotype of the patient for treatment selection and patient management. Specifically, biomarkers can aid in patient stratification (risk assessment), treatment response identification (surrogate markers), or in differential diagnosis (identifying individuals who are likely to respond to specific drugs). To be clinically useful, a marker must favorably affect clinical outcomes such as decreased toxicity, increased overall and/or disease-free survival, or improved quality of life. This paper focuses on possible clinical trial designs for assessing the utility of a predictive marker(s) for toxicity or clinical efficacy. We consider the scenario of single and multiple markers as well as present alternative solutions based on the prevalence of a marker. Our designs rest on the assumption that the methods for assessment of the biomarker are established and the initial results show promise with regard to the predictive ability of a marker. Additional research is clearly warranted to achieve the goal of 'predictive oncology'.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 325
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer: A tale of three trials [J].
Albain, KS .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (24) :1801-1804
[2]   Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer [J].
Cappuzzo, F ;
Hirsch, FR ;
Rossi, E ;
Bartolini, S ;
Ceresoli, GL ;
Bemis, L ;
Haney, J ;
Witta, S ;
Danenberg, K ;
Domenichini, I ;
Ludovini, V ;
Magrini, E ;
Gregorc, V ;
Doglioni, C ;
Sidoni, A ;
Tonato, M ;
Franklin, WA ;
Crino, L ;
Bunn, PA ;
Varella-Garcia, M .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (09) :643-655
[3]   Cetuximab shows activity in colorectal cancer patients with tumors that do not express the epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry [J].
Chung, KY ;
Shia, J ;
Kemeny, NE ;
Shah, M ;
Schwartz, GK ;
Tse, A ;
Hamilton, A ;
Pan, D ;
Schrag, D ;
Schwartz, L ;
Klimstra, DS ;
Fridman, D ;
Kelsen, DP ;
Saltz, LB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (09) :1803-1810
[4]   P53 and RB: Simple interesting correlates or tumor markers of critical predictive nature? [J].
Cordon-Cardo, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (06) :975-977
[5]  
ELIZABETH M, 2002, SEMIN ONCOL, V29, P213
[6]   Prognostic role of a multigene reverse transcriptase-PCR assay in patients with node-negative breast cancer not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy [J].
Esteva, FJ ;
Sahin, AA ;
Cristofanilli, M ;
Coombes, K ;
Lee, SJ ;
Baker, J ;
Cronin, M ;
Walker, M ;
Watson, D ;
Shak, S ;
Hortobagyi, GN .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (09) :3315-3319
[7]   A multigene RT-PCR assay used to predict recurrence in early breast cancer: two presentations with contradictory results [J].
Fiets, WE ;
Nortier, JWR .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 6 (05) :185-187
[8]  
Goetz MP, 2005, J CLIN ONCOL, V23, p138S
[9]   Primer on medical Genomics part XII: Pharmacogenomics-general principles with cancer as a model [J].
Goetz, MP ;
Ames, MM ;
Weinshilboum, RM .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 79 (03) :376-384
[10]   Tumor marker utility grading system: A framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers [J].
Hayes, DF ;
Bast, RC ;
Desch, CE ;
Fritsche, H ;
Kemeny, NE ;
Jessup, JM ;
Locker, GY ;
MacDonald, JS ;
Mennel, RG ;
Norton, L ;
Ravdin, P ;
Taube, S ;
Winn, RJ .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (20) :1456-1466