Recursive Partitioning analysis of μ-opiate receptor high throughput screening results

被引:4
作者
Horvath, D [1 ]
机构
[1] CEREP, F-92506 Rueil Malmaison, France
关键词
recursive partitioning; datamining; mu opiate receptor; pharmocophore model;
D O I
10.1080/10629360108035378
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Recursive Partitioning (RP) was used to analyze a heterogeneous data set of I-L receptor High Throughput Screening results of combinatorial libraries, lead optimization products and reference opiate ligands from literature. Different sets of molecular descriptors and various parameterization schemes have been systematically assessed in search for an optimal R-P tree, best discriminating between mu. receptor ligands and inactive molecules. This discriminating ability has been evaluated in terms of a quality criterion (representing an enrichment factor corrected by the retrieval rate of active compounds), for both the learning set-with and without performing a cross-validation test -and a distinct validation set. The non-linearity of the approach, as well as the very large number of degrees of freedom of the models, render the statistical analysis - in particular, the detection of overfitting - quite difficult. The advantages and disadvantages of the RP approach are discussed on hand of the comparative analysis of the performances of the models under the studied conditions. Eventually, the features highlighted by the R-P model as essential sources for the activity of compounds with respect to the mu receptor are analyzed in the light of commonly accepted mu, receptor binding hypotheses. It is shown that the R-P model considered to be "optimal" due to its simultaneous success in the cross-validation and validation simulations has been able to "discover" the existence of the two main ("morphine-like" and "meperidine-like") mu ligand families, represented as the two main "active nodes" of this tree.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 212
页数:32
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ALDRICH JV, 1996, BERGERS MED CHEM DRU, V3, P321
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, TOPICS APPL MULTIVAR
[3]  
BALABAN AT, 1989, STUD PHYS THEO CHEM, V63, P193
[4]   HIGHLY DISCRIMINATING DISTANCE-BASED TOPOLOGICAL INDEX [J].
BALABAN, AT .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1982, 89 (05) :399-404
[5]   Structural characterization and binding sites of G-protein-coupled receptors [J].
BeckSickinger, AG .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 1996, 1 (12) :502-513
[6]   Chemoinformatics - predicting the physicochemical properties of 'drug-like' molecules [J].
Blake, JF .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2000, 11 (01) :104-107
[7]  
Breiman L., 1984, BIOMETRICS, DOI DOI 10.2307/2530946
[8]   Recursive partitioning analysis of a large structure-activity data set using three-dimensional descriptors [J].
Chen, X ;
Rusinko, A ;
Young, SS .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 1998, 38 (06) :1054-1062
[9]   High throughput screening: Myths and future realities [J].
Eglen, RM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR SCREENING, 1999, 4 (04) :179-181
[10]   High throughput screening for drug discovery: Continually transitioning into new technology [J].
Fox, S ;
Farr-Jones, S ;
Yund, MA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR SCREENING, 1999, 4 (04) :183-186