Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH questionnaire

被引:110
作者
Jester, A [1 ]
Harth, A [1 ]
Germann, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Plast & Hand Surg, BG Trauma Ctr Ludwigshafen, Burn Ctr,Dept Hand Plast & Reconstruct Surg, D-67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME | 2005年 / 30A卷 / 05期
关键词
health status; upper extremity; evaluation; comparative data;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.04.009
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a standardized outcome measure that captures upper-extremity disability from the perspective of the patient and is used to study clinical outcomes in musculoskeletal disorders. To constitute a frame of reference for clinical values it is important for clinicians to be able to compare clinical DASH scores with those of nonclinical populations. We collected DASH data from a working population in Germany that was outside clinical considerations and used the data to identify disability levels among identified subgroups as a basis for future clinical comparisons. Methods: We evaluated the DASH data using a convenience sample of 716 employed adults. Separate analyses were performed for each of the DASH scores, which were grouped according to age, gender, and type of vocational activity. Results: The rank analysis of variance showed that statistically significant differences were found in Germany, differentiating between gender, age, and self-estimated vocational groups. Tests for interaction analyses of variance showed that increased disability was expressed as significantly higher mean DASH scores among older workers, female workers, and manual workers. Conclusions: This study provides comparative data for our clinical population and allows insight into current disability levels in a nonclinical population.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1082
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2001, INT CLASS FUNCT DIS
[2]
Beaton D E, 2001, J Hand Ther, V14, P128
[3]
Beaton DE., 2001, BR J HAND THER, V6, P109, DOI [10.1177/175899830100600401, DOI 10.1177/175899830100600401]
[4]
Factors prolonging disability in work-related cumulative trauma disorders [J].
Bonzani, PJ ;
Millender, L ;
Keelan, B ;
Mangieri, MG .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 22A (01) :30-34
[5]
Davis A M, 1999, J Hand Ther, V12, P269
[6]
Germann G, 2003, UNFALLCHIRURG, V106, P13, DOI 10.1007/s00113-002-0456-x
[7]
Germann G, 1999, Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir, V31, P149, DOI 10.1055/s-1999-13902
[8]
HUDAK PL, 1996, AM J IND MED, V29, P601
[9]
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments - Normative values from the general population [J].
Hunsaker, FG ;
Cioffi, DA ;
Amadio, PC ;
Wright, JG ;
Caughlin, B .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (02) :208-215
[10]
Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture [J].
MacDermid, JC ;
Richards, RS ;
Donner, A ;
Bellamy, N ;
Roth, JH .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 25A (02) :330-340