Robotic systems in orthopaedic surgery

被引:166
作者
Lang, J. E. [1 ]
Mannava, S. [1 ]
Floyd, A. J. [1 ]
Goddard, M. S. [1 ]
Smith, B. P. [1 ]
Mofidi, A. [1 ]
Seyler, T. M. [1 ]
Jinnah, R. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2011年 / 93B卷 / 10期
关键词
TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; NAVIGATION SYSTEM; BLOOD-LOSS; REPLACEMENT; ALIGNMENT; IMPLANTATION; ACCURACY; IMPROVE; HIP;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.93B10.27418
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Robots have been used in surgery since the late 1980s. Orthopaedic surgery began to incorporate robotic technology in 1992, with the introduction of ROBODOC, for the planning and performance of total hip replacement. The use of robotic systems has subsequently increased, with promising short-term radiological outcomes when compared with traditional orthopaedic procedures. Robotic systems can be classified into two categories: autonomous and haptic (or surgeon-guided). Passive surgery systems, which represent a third type of technology, have also been adopted recently by orthopaedic surgeons. While autonomous systems have fallen out of favour, tactile systems with technological improvements have become widely used. Specifically, the use of tactile and passive robotic systems in unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has addressed some of the historical mechanisms of failure of non-robotic UKR. These systems assist with increasing the accuracy of the alignment of the components and produce more consistent ligament balance. Short-term improvements in clinical and radiological outcomes have increased the popularity of robot-assisted UKR. Robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery has the potential for improving surgical outcomes. We discuss the different types of robotic systems available for use in orthopaedics and consider the indication, contraindications and limitations of these technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1299
页数:4
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2009, SEMIN ARTHROPLASTY
[2]
[Anonymous], 2002, SHORTER OXFORD ENGLI, V2, P2598
[3]
Banks Scott A, 2009, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V38, P23
[4]
Robots in orthopaedic surgery - Past, present, and future [J].
Bargar, William L. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (463) :31-36
[5]
CT-based and CT-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty.: Results of a prospective study [J].
Bäthis, H ;
Perlick, L ;
Lüring, C ;
Kalteis, T ;
Grifka, J .
UNFALLCHIRURG, 2003, 106 (11) :935-940
[6]
Bellamy N., 1988, J Orthop Rheumatol, V1, P95
[7]
Navigation Did Not Improve the Precision of Minimally Invasive Knee Arthroplasty [J].
Bonutti, Peter M. ;
Dethmers, Daniel A. ;
McGrath, Mike S. ;
Ulrich, Slif D. ;
Mont, Michael A. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 466 (11) :2730-2735
[8]
Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies [J].
Brin, Yaron S. ;
Nikolaou, Vassilios S. ;
Joseph, Lawrence ;
Zukor, David J. ;
Antoniou, John .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (03) :331-339
[9]
Clemens U, 2005, ORTHOPEDICS, V28, pS1259
[10]
Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement - A prospective, randomised controlled study of the Acrobot system [J].
Cobb, J ;
Henckel, J ;
Gomes, P ;
Harris, S ;
Jakopec, M ;
Rodriguez y Baena, F ;
Barrett, A ;
Davies, B .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (02) :188-197