Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

被引:48
作者
Guerra, Giselle [1 ]
Srinivas, Titte R. [1 ]
Meier-Kriesche, Herwig-Ulf [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Div Nephrol Hypertens & Transplant, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
关键词
calcineurin inhibitors; immunosuppression; mycophenolate mofetil; m-TOR inhibitors;
D O I
10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00528.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) revolutionized kidney transplantation (KTx). Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival could be achieved with CNI-based (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) immunosuppressive protocols. However, despite short-term success, long-term graft attrition continues to be a significant problem, thus leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may be contributing to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Therefore, newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs altogether. Protocols exploring these options have gained greater attention over the last few years. Herein, we review studies addressing either CNI withdrawal or CNI avoidance strategies as well as discuss the risks versus benefits of these protocols. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion, the use of CNIs as a part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI withdrawal and avoidance strategies need to be further validated in controlled clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 827
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Cyclosporine withdrawal from a mycophenolate mofetil-containing immunosuppressive regimen in stable kidney transplant recipients: A randomized, controlled study [J].
Abramowicz, D ;
Manas, D ;
Lao, M ;
Vanrenterghem, Y ;
del Castillo, D ;
Wijngaard, P ;
Fung, S .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (12) :1725-1734
[2]   Cyclosporine withdrawal from a mycophenolate mofetil-containing immunosuppressive regimen: Results of a five-year, prospective, randomized study [J].
Abramowicz, D ;
Rial, MD ;
Vitko, S ;
del Castillo, D ;
Manas, D ;
Lao, M ;
Gafner, N ;
Wijngaard, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (07) :2234-2240
[3]   Low-dose mycophenolate mofetil is an effective and safe treatment to permit phased reduction in calcineurin inhibitors in chronic allograft nephropathy [J].
Aftali, B ;
Shah, S ;
Chowdhury, P ;
O'Sullivan, H ;
Taylor, J ;
Goldsmith, D .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (03) :304-309
[4]   Randomized trial of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine oral solution (modified) plus mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: Results at 2 years [J].
Ahsan, N ;
Johnson, C ;
Gonwa, T ;
Halloran, P ;
Stegall, M ;
Hardy, M ;
Metzger, R ;
Shield, C ;
Rocher, L ;
Scandling, J ;
Sorensen, J ;
Mulloy, L ;
Light, J ;
Corwin, C ;
Danovitch, G ;
Wachs, M ;
VanVeldhuisen, P ;
Salm, K ;
Tolzman, D ;
Fitzsimmons, WE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (02) :245-250
[5]   Synergistic effects of cyclosporine and rapamycin in a chronic nephrotoxicity model [J].
Andoh, TF ;
Lindsley, J ;
Franceschini, N ;
Bennett, WM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 62 (03) :311-316
[6]  
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANTAT S2
[7]   ISATX247:: A novel calcineurin inhibitor [J].
Aspeslet, L ;
Freitag, D ;
Trepanier, D ;
Abel, M ;
Naicker, S ;
Kneteman, N ;
Foster, R ;
Yatscoff, R .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (1-2) :1048-1051
[8]   Molecular and structural consequences of early renal allograft injury [J].
Baboolal, K ;
Jones, GA ;
Janezic, A ;
Griffiths, DR ;
Jurewicz, WA .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 61 (02) :686-696
[9]  
Bennett WM, 1996, TRANSPL P, V28, P2100
[10]   A Randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimums/mycophenolate versus cyclosporine/sirolimus in renal transplantation: Three-year analysis [J].
Ciancio, G ;
Burke, GW ;
Gaynor, JJ ;
Ruiz, P ;
Roth, D ;
Kupin, W ;
Rosen, A ;
Miller, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (06) :845-852