Multi-criteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation

被引:452
作者
Tzeng, GH
Lin, CW
Opricovic, S
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Traff & Transportat, Energy & Environm Res Grp, Inst Technol & Management, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Civil Engn, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
alternative fuel; electric bus; public transportation; multi-criteria analysis; compromise solution; TOPSIS; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The technological development of buses with new alternative fuels is considered in this paper. Several types of fuels are considered as alternative-fuel modes, i.e., electricity, fuel cell (hydrogen), and methanol. Electric vehicles may be considered the alternative-fuel vehicles with the lowest air pollution. Hybrid electric vehicles provide an alternate mode, at least for the period of improving the technology of electric vehicles. A hybrid electric vehicle is defined as a vehicle with the conventional internal combustion engine and an electric motor as its major sources of power. Experts from different decision-making groups performed the multiple attribute evaluation of alternative vehicles. AHP is applied to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria. TOPSIS and VIKOR are compared and applied to determine the best compromise alternative fuel mode. The result shows that the hybrid electric bus is the most suitable substitute bus for Taiwan urban areas in the short and median term. But, if the cruising distance of the electric bus extends to an acceptable range, the pure electric bus could be the best alternative. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1373 / 1383
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ENERGY ENV, DOI DOI 10.1177/0958305X9300400304
[2]  
[Anonymous], NATURAL HAZARDS REV, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:2(59)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, FUTURE DRIVE ELECT V
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LECT NOTES ECON M, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Visekriterijumska optimizacija sistema u graevinarstvu
[6]   Evaluation of fuel cell auxiliary power units for heavy-duty diesel trucks [J].
Brodrick, CJ ;
Lipman, TE ;
Farshchi, M ;
Lutsey, NP ;
Dwyer, HA ;
Sperling, D ;
Gouse, SW ;
Harris, DB ;
King, FG .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 7 (04) :303-315
[7]   The health and visibility cost of air pollution: a comparison of estimation methods [J].
Delucchi, MA ;
Murphy, JJ ;
McCubbin, DR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 64 (02) :139-152
[8]   An analysis of the retail and lifecycle cost of battery-powered electric vehicles [J].
Delucchi, MA ;
Lipman, TE .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 6 (06) :371-404
[10]  
GRIFFITH P, 1996, P 13 EL VEH S OS JAP