Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy

被引:149
作者
Nopens, I. [1 ]
Benedetti, L. [1 ]
Jeppsson, U. [2 ]
Pons, M. -N. [3 ]
Alex, J. [4 ]
Copp, J. B. [5 ]
Gernaey, K. V. [6 ]
Rosen, C. [7 ]
Steyer, J. -P. [8 ]
Vanrolleghem, P. A. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, BIOMATH, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Lund Univ, IEA, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[3] LSGC CNRS ENSIC INPL, F-54001 Nancy, France
[4] Ifak eV Magdeburg, D-39179 Barleben, Germany
[5] Primodal Inc, Hamilton, ON L8S 3A4, Canada
[6] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Chem & Biochem Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[7] VA Ingenjorerna, Veolia Water Solut & Technol, SE-21228 Malmo, Sweden
[8] INRA, UR050, Lab Biotechnol Environm, F-11100 Narbonne, France
[9] Univ Laval, Dept Genie Civil, ModelEAU, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
关键词
benchmarking; BSM2; control; evaluation criteria; plant-wide modelling; simulation; wastewater treatment; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2010.044
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The COST/IWA Benchmark Simulation Model No 1 (BSM1) has been available for almost a decade. Its primary purpose has been to create a platform for control strategy benchmarking of activated sludge processes. The fact that the research work related to the benchmark simulation models has resulted in more than 300 publications worldwide demonstrates the interest in and need of such tools within the research community. Recent efforts within the IWA Task Group on "Benchmarking of control strategies for WWTPs" have focused on an extension of the benchmark simulation model. This extension aims at facilitating control strategy development and performance evaluation at a plant-wide level and, consequently, includes both pretreatment of wastewater as well as the processes describing sludge treatment. The motivation for the extension is the increasing interest and need to operate and control wastewater treatment systems not only at an individual process level but also on a plant-wide basis. To facilitate the changes, the evaluation period has been extended to one year. A prolonged evaluation period allows for long-term control strategies to be assessed and enables the use of control handles that cannot be evaluated in a realistic fashion in the one week BSM1 evaluation period. In this paper, the finalised plant layout is summarised and, as was done for BSM1, a default control strategy is proposed. A demonstration of how BSM2 can be used to evaluate control strategies is also given.
引用
收藏
页码:1967 / 1974
页数:8
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] ATV, 2000, A131 ATV
  • [2] Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: A global assessment
    Camargo, Julio A.
    Alonso, Alvaro
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 32 (06) : 831 - 849
  • [3] Copp J.B., 2002, The COST simulation benchmark-Description and simulator manual
  • [4] DOWNS JJ, 2009, P INT S ADV CONTR CH
  • [5] GERNAEY KV, BENCHMARKING C UNPUB
  • [6] Harris R.W., 1982, PROCESS DESIGN COST
  • [7] Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies
    Jeppsson, U.
    Pons, M. -N.
    Nopens, I.
    Alex, J.
    Copp, J. B.
    Gernaey, K. V.
    Rosen, C.
    Steyer, J. -P.
    Vanrolleghem, P. A.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 56 (08) : 67 - 78
  • [8] Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs
    Jeppsson, U
    Rosen, C
    Alex, J
    Copp, J
    Gernaey, K
    Pons, MN
    Vanrolleghem, PA
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 53 (01) : 287 - 295
  • [9] The COST benchmark simulation model - current state and future perspective
    Jeppsson, U
    Pons, MN
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING PRACTICE, 2004, 12 (03) : 299 - 304
  • [10] Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation
    Rosen, C
    Jeppsson, U
    Vanrolleghem, PA
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 50 (11) : 41 - 49