Ideas, private institutions and American welfare state 'exceptionalism':: the case of health and old-age insurance, 1915-1965

被引:66
作者
Béland, D
Hacker, JS
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Sociol, Fac Social Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[2] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
historical new institutionalism; policy paradigms; policy feedback; health insurance; old-age insurance; pensions; welfare capitalism; welfare state development; United States;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-6866.2004.00296.x
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Traditional theories of welfare state development divide into two camps: societal accounts and institutional accounts. The aim of the present article is to amend and enrich the institutional approach to US social policy by reconsidering key aspects of the genesis of the American welfare state: 1) showing that concepts such as 'policy feedback' and 'path dependence' need to be extended to encompass the effect of private social policies; and 2) taking policy paradigms and agenda setting more seriously than is the norm in institutional scholarship. The empirical analysis is divided into two parts. The first part explores the activities of the American Association for Labor Legislation (AALL) in the decade beginning in 1910 and the genesis of Social Security in the 1930s, while the second part examines the effect of the private benefit developments on policy choices between 1935 and 1965.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 54
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] ADEMA W, 1999, NET SOCIAL EXPENDITU
  • [2] ALTMEYER AJ, 1965, FORMATIVE YEARS SOCI
  • [3] *AM COUNC LIF INS, 1973, 1973 LIF INS FACT BO
  • [4] ANDREWS JB, 1929, AM LABOR LEGISLATION, V19, P357
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1993, The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880-1940
  • [6] [Anonymous], POLITICAL SCI Q
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1994, CLOSING DOOR DESTITU
  • [8] BERKOWITZ ED, 1994, CREATING WELFARE STA
  • [9] Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy
    Campbell, JL
    [J]. THEORY AND SOCIETY, 1998, 27 (03) : 377 - 409
  • [10] *CES, 1935, REP COMM EC SEC