A techno-economic comparison between two design configurations for a small scale, biomass-to-energy gasification based system

被引:90
作者
Arena, U. [1 ,2 ]
Di Gregorio, F. [1 ]
Santonastasi, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples 2, Dept Environm Sci, I-81100 Caserta, Italy
[2] AMRA Scarl, I-80125 Naples, Italy
关键词
Biomass; Biomass-to-energy; Gasification; Fluidization; Technical and economic analysis; TAR REMOVAL; PERFORMANCE; COMBUSTION; TECHNOLOGIES; SYNGAS; PLANTS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.067
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biomass has great potential as a clean and renewable feedstock for producing modern energy carriers. This paper focuses on the process of biomass gasification, wherein the synthesis gas is subsequently used to produce electricity. A comparison between the most promising design configurations for the industrial application of gasification based, biomass-to-energy cogenerators in the 100-600 kWe range is presented. Mass and energy balances and material and substance flow analyses drawn for each design solutions are based on the experimental data obtained from a pilot scale bubbling fluidized bed air gasifier, having a feeding capacity of 100 kg/h and operated with a commercially available, natural biomass. Measurements taken during the experimental tests include the syngas complete composition as well as the characterization of the bed material, the entrained fines collected at the cyclone and the purge material from the scrubber. The techno-economic performances of two energy generation devices, a gas engine and an externally-fired gas turbine, have been estimated on the basis of the manufacturer's specifications. The study concludes that the internal combustion engine layout is the solution that currently offers the higher reliability and provides the higher internal rate of return for the investigated range of electrical energy production. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:580 / 590
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Recursive operability analysis of a pilot plant gasifier [J].
Arena, U. ;
Romeo, E. ;
Mastellone, M. L. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2008, 21 (01) :50-65
[2]  
ARENA U, 2010, COMB SCI TECH, V182, P1
[3]  
ARENA U, 2010, ENG FDN C INT, P805
[4]   Tar removal during the fluidized bed gasification of plastic waste [J].
Arena, Umberto ;
Zaccariello, Lucio ;
Mastellone, Maria Laura .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (02) :783-791
[5]   Biomass as an energy source: Thermodynamic constraints on the performance of the conversion process [J].
Baratieri, M. ;
Baggio, P. ;
Fiori, L. ;
Grigiante, A. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (15) :7063-7073
[6]  
BEER JM, 1980, I ENERGY S SERIES, V4
[7]   Combustion of syngas in internal combustion engines [J].
Boehman, Andre L. ;
Le Corre, Olivier .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 180 (06) :1193-1206
[8]   THE TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC-FEASIBILITY OF BIOMASS GASIFICATION FOR POWER-GENERATION [J].
BRIDGWATER, AV .
FUEL, 1995, 74 (05) :631-653
[9]  
Brunner P.H., 2003, Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis
[10]   The impact of feedstock cost on technology selection and optimum size [J].
Cameron, Jay B. ;
Kumar, Amit ;
Flynn, Peter C. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2007, 31 (2-3) :137-144