Effect of depletion of interstitial hyaluronan on hydraulic conductance in rabbit knee synovium

被引:26
作者
Coleman, PJ
Scott, D
Abiona, A
Ashhurst, DE
Mason, RM
Levick, JR
机构
[1] St George Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Physiol, London SW17 0RE, England
[2] St George Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Anat, London SW17 0RE, England
[3] Charing Cross Hosp, Imperial Coll, Sch Med, Div Biomed Sci, London W6 8RF, England
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON | 1998年 / 509卷 / 03期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.695bm.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
1. The hydraulic resistance of the synovial lining to fluid outflow from a joint cavity ((Q) over dot (s)) is important for the retention of intra-articular lubricant. The resistance has been attributed in part to extracellular glycosaminoglycans, including hyaluronan and chondroitin sulphates. Increased permeability in joints infused with testicular hyaluronidase, which digests both chondroitin sulphates and hyaluronan, supports this view. In this study the importance of interstitial hyaluronan per se was assessed using leech and Streptomyces hyaluronidases, which degrade only hyaluronan. 2. Ringer solution was infused into the knee joint cavity of anaesthetized rabbits for 30 min, with or without hyaluronidase, after which intra-articular pressure (P-j) was raised and the relation between pressure and outflow determined. 3. Treatment with Streptomyces, leech or testicular hyaluronidases increased the fluid escape rates by similar factors, namely 4- to 6-fold. After Streptomyces hyaluronidase treatment the slope d(Q) over dot (s)/dP(j), which at low pressures represents synovial hydraulic conductance, increased from a control of 0.90 +/- 0.20 mu l min(-1) cmH(2)O(-1) (mean +/- S.E.M., n = 6) to 4.52 +/- 0.70 mu l min(-1) cmH(2)O(-1). The slope d(Q) over dot (s)/dP(j) increased to a similar level after testicular hyaluronidase, namely to 4.14 +/- 1.06 mu l min(-1) cmH(2)O(-1) (control, 0.54 +/- 0.24 mu l min(-1) cmH(2)O(-1)). Streptomyces and leech hyaluronidases were as effective as testicular hyaluronidase (no statistically significant differences) despite differences in substrate specificity. 4. It was shown using histochemical and immunohistochemical techniques that hyaluronan was removed from the synovium blv leech, Streptomyces and testicular hyaluronidases. The binding of antibodies,2-B-6 and 3-B-3 showed that the core proteins of the chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans remained intact after treatment with hyaluronidases, and the binding of 5-D-4 showed that keratan sulphate was unaffected. An azocasein digestion assay confirmed that the hyaluronidase preparations had no significant proteolytic activity. 5. The effect of the hyaluronidases was four times greater than predicted from the low concentration of interstitial hyaluronan and its resistivity Factors that might amplify the effect of hyaluronan depletion include the matrix-organizing role of hyaluronan, and/or non-uniformity of hyaluronan distribution. It is concluded that interstitial hyaluronan makes a major contribution to synovial hydraulic resistance, but the mechanisms are as yet poorly understood.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 710
页数:16
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ASHHURST DE, 1991, J RHEUMATOL, V18, P1669
[2]  
BERT JL, 1995, PORTL PR P, P101
[3]  
Carley William W., 1996, Microcirculation (Philadelphia), V3, P359, DOI 10.3109/10739689609148308
[4]  
CATERSON B, 1985, FED PROC, V44, P386
[5]  
COLEMAN PJ, 1998, IN PRESS HISTOCHEMIC, V30
[6]  
DAY TD, 1952, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V117, P1
[7]   ON THE PRESENCE OF PROTEOLYTIC ACTIVITY IN GLYCOSAMINOGLYCAN-DEGRADING ENZYME PREPARATIONS [J].
HARRISSON, F ;
VANHOOF, J ;
VANROELEN, C .
JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1986, 34 (09) :1231-1235
[8]   CORNEAL RESISTANCE TO THE FLOW OF WATER AFTER ENZYMATIC DIGESTION [J].
HEDBYS, BO .
EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 1963, 2 (02) :112-121
[9]  
HENDERSONKJ, 1993, BRIT J RHEUMATOLO S1, V32, P25
[10]   TYPE-VI COLLAGEN MICROFIBRILS - EVIDENCE FOR A STRUCTURAL ASSOCIATION WITH HYALURONAN [J].
KIELTY, CM ;
WHITTAKER, SP ;
GRANT, ME ;
SHUTTLEWORTH, CA .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1992, 118 (04) :979-990