Standardization of the TRUE Test imidazolidinyl urea and diazolidinyl urea patches

被引:9
作者
Agner, T
Andersen, KE
Björkner, B
Bruze, M
Frosch, PJ
Gruvberger, B
Hoeck, U
Kreilgaard, B
Menné, T
Sommer, J
机构
[1] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, DK-2900 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[3] Malmo Univ Hosp, Malmo, Sweden
[4] Hautklin Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
[5] Pharmacia Corp, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
imidazolidinyl urea; Germall; 115; diazolidinyl urea; Germall II; TRUE Test; formaldehyde; dose-response; concomitant reaction; allergic contact dermatitis; contact allergy; patch testing technique;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.045001021.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The preservatives imidazolidinyl urea (IMID, Germall 115) and diazolidinyl urea (DU, Germall II) are commonly used in cosmetic products and are well-known sensitizers. The aim of the present study was to establish the optimal patch test concentration in hydrophilic dried-in vehicle (TRUE Test) for IMID and DU. 181 patients were included in the study. Of these, 150 were patients referred for patch testing, 12 were patients with known allergy to IMID and 19 were patients with known allergy to DU. 76 consecutive patients and the 12 IMID-allergic patients were patch tested with a dilution series IMID (0 to 600 mug/cm(2)), formaldehyde (180 rhog/cm(2)) and DU (200 mug/cm(2)). 74 consecutive patients and the 19 DU-allergic patients were patch tested with a dilution series of DU (0 to 600 mug/cm(2)), formaldehyde (180 mug/cm) and IMID (200 mug/cm(2)). A positive dose-response relationship was found. The number of doubtful reactions decreased with increasing test concentrations. No late reactions were observed. A patch test concentration in hydrophilic dried-in vehicle (TRUE Test) of 600 mug/cm(2) was found to be adequate and safe for both IMID and DU.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 25
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A 5-YEAR STUDY OF COSMETIC REACTIONS [J].
ADAMS, RM ;
MAIBACH, HI .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1985, 13 (06) :1062-1069
[2]  
Albert M R, 1999, Am J Contact Dermat, V10, P219, DOI 10.1016/S1046-199X(99)90072-6
[3]  
BRANCACCIO RR, 1993, AM J CONTACT DERMATI, V4, P55
[4]   PATCH TEST REACTIVITY TO DMDM HYDANTOIN - RELATIONSHIP TO FORMALDEHYDE ALLERGY [J].
DEGROOT, AC ;
VANJOOST, T ;
BOS, JD ;
VANDERMEEREN, HLM ;
WEYLAND, JW .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1988, 18 (04) :197-201
[5]   IMIDAZOLIDINYL UREA DERMATITIS [J].
DOOMSGOOSSENS, A ;
DEBOULLE, K ;
DOOMS, M ;
DEGREEF, H .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1986, 14 (05) :322-324
[6]  
EDMAN B, 1994, SWEDISH MULTICENTER
[7]  
Fisher A A, 1975, Contact Dermatitis, V1, P126, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1975.tb05348.x
[8]  
FISHER T, 1995, CURR PROBL DERMATOL, V22, P24
[9]   Threshold for occluded formaldehyde patch test in formaldehyde-sensitive patients - Relationship to repeated open application test with a product containing formaldehyde releaser [J].
Flyvholm, MA ;
Hall, BM ;
Agner, T ;
Tiedemann, E ;
Greenhill, P ;
Vanderveken, W ;
Freeberg, FE ;
Menne, T .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1997, 36 (01) :26-33
[10]   REACTIONS TO QUATERNIUM-15, BRONOPOL AND GERMALL-115 IN A STANDARD SERIES [J].
FORD, GP ;
BECK, MH .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1986, 14 (05) :271-274