A comparison of cause-specific melanoma mortality and all-cause mortality in survival analyses after radiation treatment for uveal melanoma

被引:47
作者
Kroll, S
Char, DH
Quivey, J
Castro, J
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Ophthalmol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91121-6
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 [眼科学];
摘要
Objective: To determine the causes and patterns of mortality after uveal melanoma radiation. Design: A cohort study from a single institution was performed. Mortality was modeled using semiparametric survival techniques. All cause and cause-specific mortality analyses were performed. Mortality was compared with expected mortality from the U.S. census data. Participants: A total of 731 patients were studied, and 710 (97%) of these had medium or large melanomas. The mean tumor diameter was 11.3 mm, and the mean tumor thickness was 5.8 mm. Ciliary body was involved in 122 (17%) of patients. Complete follow-up was available on 99.6% (728 of 731) of patients. Main Outcome Measures: The authors analyzed the distribution and causes of post-treatment mortality. Results: The 5- and 10-year all-cause Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 75.6% and 62.3%, respectively. Both melanoma risk factors (older age, ciliary body involvement, and larger tumor diameter) and nonmelanoma risk factors (older age and medical condition) were significant prognostic factors of all-cause mortality. Deaths from nonmelanoma causes accounted for 91 (42.3%) of 215 deaths. The 5-year and 10-year estimates of nonmelanoma deaths were 8.3% and 15.9%, respectively. Nonmelanoma mortality was similar to that observed in the general U.S. population (91 observed, 98.1 expected). Melanoma metastases accounted for 124 (57.7%) of 215 deaths. The 5- and 10-year estimates for probability of metastatic death were 16.1% and 21.8%, respectively. The largest tumor diameter was the best predictor for melanoma mortality; ciliary body involvement, older age, and distance from the fovea also were significant in multivariate analyses. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients with uveal melanoma die of nonmelanoma causes after radiation. In analyzing prognostic factors, considerable information may be lost if analyses are based on all-cause mortality rather than cause-specific mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:2035 / 2045
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Albert DM, 1996, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V114, P107
[2]
ANDERSON PK, 1993, SPRINGER SERIES STAT
[3]
AUGSBURGER JJ, 1986, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V104, P655
[4]
ESTIMATES OF ABSOLUTE CAUSE-SPECIFIC RISK IN COHORT STUDIES [J].
BENICHOU, J ;
GAIL, MH .
BIOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (03) :813-826
[5]
THE ANALYSIS OF MORTALITY BY THE SUBJECT-YEARS METHOD [J].
BERRY, G .
BIOMETRICS, 1983, 39 (01) :173-184
[6]
BRADY L W, 1992, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, V168, P61
[7]
Callender G., 1942, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V25, P962, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9394(42)90595-6
[8]
Ten-year follow-up of helium ion therapy for uveal melanoma [J].
Char, DH ;
Kroll, SM ;
Castro, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 125 (01) :81-89
[9]
5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF HELIUM ION THERAPY FOR UVEAL MELANOMA [J].
CHAR, DH ;
CASTRO, JR ;
KROLL, SM ;
IRVINE, AR ;
QUIVEY, JM ;
STONE, RD .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1990, 108 (02) :209-214
[10]
CHAR DH, 1993, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V100, P1547