Procedural and distributive justice in the editorial review process

被引：30

作者：

Gilliland, SW ^{[1
]}

Beckstein, BA ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] LOUISIANA STATE UNIV,BATON ROUGE,LA 70803

来源：

PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY | 1996年 / 49卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01589.x

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

Based on organizational justice theories, a model of procedural and distributive justice is proposed to explain authors' reactions to editorial decisions and the editorial review process. Authors (n=106) provided justice perceptions and future journal submission intentions upon receiving an editorial decision letter. The editor provided information on editorial decisions and review processes. Explanation and interpersonal sensitivity were important procedural justice dimensions in predicting distributive justice reactions and intentions to submit future work to the journal. Explanations appear particularly important when the decision is negative. Journal submission intentions were positively related to distributive justice reactions for inexperienced, but not experienced, authors. In addition, journal submission intentions were positively related to the perceived explanation received for experienced, but not inexperienced, authors. Discussion focuses on implications for organizational justice theories and for journal publishing and HR practices.

引用

页码：669 / 691

页数：23

共 33 条

[1]

ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267

[2]

[Anonymous], 1985, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management

[3]

[Anonymous], 1985, PUBLISHING

[4]

[Anonymous], 1980, Social exchange: Advances in theory and research, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2]