Postoperative analgesic efficacy of peripheral levobupivacaine and ropivacaine:: A prospective, randomized double-blind trial in patients after total knee arthroplasty

被引:33
作者
Heid, Florian [1 ]
Muller, Nicole [1 ]
Piepho, Tim [1 ]
Baeres, Maren [1 ]
Giesa, Markus [2 ]
Drees, Philipp [2 ]
Ruemelin, Andreas [1 ]
Werner, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Anesthesiol, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Orthopaed Surg, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b493
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: Several previous trials have characterized the intra- and postoperative effects of the recently introduced local anesthetics, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine, for a variety of continuous peripheral nerve blocks. METHODS: We compared the analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine 0.125% versus ropivacaine 0.2% via patient-controlled femoral nerve analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. In a double-blind, randomized, prospective design, 60 patients received femoral infusion with either substance. We analyzed postoperative local anesthetic consumption, pain scores, motor block, and opioid requirements over 72 h. RESULTS: Pain scores, motor block incidence, and opioid requirements were low and not different between the groups. Ropivacaine consumption in milligrams was 67% higher than that of levobupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: Both levobupivacaine 0.125% and ropivacaine 0.2% provide similar analgesia after total knee arthroplasty with the latter being less potent.
引用
收藏
页码:1559 / 1561
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]
Pain relief and motor function during continuous interscalene analgesia after open shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison between levobupivacaine 0.25%, and ropivacaine 0.25% or 0.4% [J].
Borghi, B. ;
Facchini, F. E. ;
Agnoletti, V. ;
Adduci, A. ;
Lambertini, A. ;
Marini, E. ;
Gallerani, P. ;
Sassoli, V. ;
Luppi, M. ;
Casati, A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2006, 23 (12) :1005-1009
[2]
Levobupivacaine 0.2% or 0.125% for continuous sciatic nerve block: A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with 0.2% ropivacaine [J].
Casati, A ;
Vinciguerra, F ;
Cappelleri, G ;
Aldegheri, G ;
Grispigni, C ;
Putzu, M ;
Rivoltini, P .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (03) :919-923
[3]
Interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia for open shoulder surgery: A randomized, double-blinded comparison between levobupivacaine and ropivacaine [J].
Casati, A ;
Borghi, B ;
Fanelli, G ;
Montone, N ;
Rotini, R ;
Fraschini, G ;
Vinciguerra, F ;
Torri, G ;
Chelly, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (01) :253-259
[4]
A pilot study on continuous femoral perineural catheter for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty - The effect on physical rehabilitation and outcomes [J].
De Ruyter, Martin L. ;
Brueilly, Kevin E. ;
Harrison, Barry A. ;
Greengrass, Roy A. ;
Putzke, John D. ;
Brodersen, Mark P. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (08) :1111-1117
[5]
Groban L, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P37
[6]
Epidural ropivacaine - where are the benefits? A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial in patients with retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Heid, F. ;
Schmidt-Glintzer, A. ;
Piepho, T. ;
Jage, J. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 51 (03) :294-298
[7]
Cardiotoxicity with modern local anaesthetics - Is there a safer choice? [J].
Mather, LE ;
Chang, DHT .
DRUGS, 2001, 61 (03) :333-342
[8]
Systemic toxicity and resuscitation in bupivacaine-, levobupivacaine-, or ropivacaine-infused rats [J].
Ohmura, S ;
Kawada, M ;
Ohta, T ;
Yamamoto, K ;
Kobayashi, T .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (03) :743-748
[9]
RAJ PP, 1975, ANESTH ANALG, V54, P489