Antiovulatory and postcoital antifertility activity of the antiprogestin CDB-2914 when administered as single, multiple, or continuous doses to rats

被引:35
作者
Reel, JR
Hild-Petito, S
Blye, RP
机构
[1] BIOQUAL Inc, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[2] NICHHD, Populat Res Ctr, Contracept & Reprod Hlth Branch, NIH, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
antagonist; contraception; endometrium; anti-implantation;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-7824(98)00067-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The present studies in rats were undertaken to investigate the potential of a new antiprogestin, CDB-2914, for use as an emergency postcoital contraceptive for women. When given orally at noon on the day of proestrus, both CDB-2914 and mifepristone displayed dose-dependent antiovulatory activity; however, CDB-2914 was about eight times more potent than mifepristone. Both antiprogestins were considerably less potent in blocking ovulation when injected subcutaneously. To evaluate antifertility activity during continuous low dose administration, rats were dosed orally with 0.5 mg of either CDB-2914 or mifepris tone daily, commencing on the day of estrus and continuing for 24 days. Females were cohabited with proven fertile males on day 8 of treatment and were removed 1-3 days later after confirmed mating. The pregnancy rate was significantly reduced (p <0.05) only in the CDB-2914-treated females; however, the mean number of normal implantation sites per pregnant rat was significantly reduced (p <0.05) by mifepristone as compared with the vehicle control group. CDB-2914 was also found to prevent pregnancy when administered orally after mating from days 0-3 during tubal egg transport, or from days 4-6 during the pre- and peri-implantation periods. To determine the day of maximal sensitivity to CDB-2914, a single 2-mg dose per rat was given orally on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 postmating. This dose of CDB-2914 was without effect on pregnancy at days 0, 1, 2, or 3 postmating. In contrast, 2 mg CDB-2914 per rat was highly effective in blocking pregnancy when given on either day 4 or 5 postmating. Collectively, these data demonstrate that CDB-2914 is an orally active postcoital antifertility agent that is more potent than mifepristone in the rat. Hence, CDB-2914 may prove to be an effective emergency postcoital contraceptive in women. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   DAILY ADMINISTRATION OF THE PROGESTERONE ANTAGONIST RU-486 PREVENTS IMPLANTATION IN THE CYCLING GUINEA-PIG [J].
BATISTA, MC ;
BRISTOW, TL ;
MATHEWS, J ;
STOKES, WS ;
LORIAUX, DL ;
NIEMAN, LK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (01) :82-86
[2]   DELAYED ENDOMETRIAL MATURATION INDUCED BY DAILY ADMINISTRATION OF THE ANTIPROGESTIN RU-486 - A POTENTIAL NEW CONTRACEPTIVE STRATEGY [J].
BATISTA, MC ;
CARTLEDGE, TP ;
ZELLMER, AW ;
MERINO, MJ ;
AXIOTIS, C ;
LORIAUX, DL ;
NIEMAN, LK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 167 (01) :60-65
[3]  
BLYE RP, 1973, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V116, P1044
[4]  
BLYE RP, 1970, ADV BIOSCI, V4, P323
[5]  
Cameron ST, 1996, HUM REPROD, V11, P2518
[6]   EFFECTS OF CONTINUOUS TREATMENT WITH LOW-DOSE MIFEPRISTONE THROUGHOUT ONE MENSTRUAL-CYCLE [J].
CROXATTO, HB ;
SALVATIERRA, AM ;
CROXATTO, HD ;
FUENTEALBA, B .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1993, 8 (02) :201-207
[7]   Anti-implantation activity of antiestrogens and mifepristone [J].
Dao, B ;
Vanage, G ;
Marshall, A ;
Bardin, CW ;
Koide, SS .
CONTRACEPTION, 1996, 54 (04) :253-258
[8]   INVIVO EVIDENCE AGAINST THE EXISTENCE OF ANTIPROGESTINS DISRUPTING RECEPTOR-BINDING TO DNA [J].
DELABRE, K ;
GUIOCHONMANTEL, A ;
MILGROM, E .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1993, 90 (10) :4421-4425
[9]   ETHINYL ESTRADIOL AND CONJUGATED ESTROGENS AS POST-COITAL CONTRACEPTIVES [J].
DIXON, GW ;
SCHLESSELMAN, JJ ;
ORY, HW ;
BLYE, RP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1980, 244 (12) :1336-1339
[10]   STUDIES ON THE MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF PROGESTERONE ANTAGONISTS [J].
ELGER, W ;
BEIER, S ;
CHWALISZ, K ;
FAHNRICH, M ;
HASAN, SH ;
HENDERSON, D ;
NEEF, G ;
ROHDE, R .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1986, 25 (5B) :835-845