Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy

被引:835
作者
Devine-Wright, P [1 ]
机构
[1] De Montfort Univ, Inst Energy & Sustainable Dev, Leicester LE1 9BH, Leics, England
关键词
wind farms; public perceptions; public acceptability; NIMBYism;
D O I
10.1002/we.124
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
It is widely recognised that public acceptability often poses a barrier towards renewable energy development. This article reviews existing research on public perceptions of wind energy, where opposition is typically characterized by the NIMBY (not in my back yard) concept. The objectives of the article are to provide a critical assessment of post research and an integrated, multidimensional framework to guide future work. Six distinct strands 14 of research are identified, summarized and critiqued. public support for switching from conventional energy sources to wind energy; aspects of turbines associated with negative perceptions; the impact of physical proximity to turbines; acceptance over time of wind forms; NIMBYism as an explanation for negative perceptions; and, finally, the impact of local involvement on perceptions. Research across these strands is characterized by opinion poll studies of general beliefs and case studies of perceptions of specific developments. In both cases, research is fragmented and has failed to adequately explain, rather than merely describe, perceptual processes. The article argues for more theoretically informed empirical research, grounded in social science concepts and methods. A multidimensional framework is proposed that goes beyond the NIMBY label and integrates previous findings with social and environmental psychological theory. Copyright (c) 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 139
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [1] *AIM RES AS, 1993, HOLD VIND EN REP PRE
  • [2] Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain
    Alvarez-Farizo, B
    Hanley, N
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (02) : 107 - 116
  • [3] ANDERSON, 1997, RAPPORT HVORDAN DANS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNIT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1977, Soft Energy Paths
  • [6] [Anonymous], GUARDIAN 0728
  • [7] Barac C., 1983, International Journal of Ambient Energy, V4, P199, DOI 10.1080/01430750.1983.9675888
  • [8] BARNETT J, 2004, RES METHODS SOCIAL P, pCH12
  • [9] Willingness to pay for renewable energy: Implications for UK green tariff offerings
    Batley, SL
    Fleming, PD
    Urwin, P
    [J]. INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 9 (3-4) : 157 - 170
  • [10] Berger P.L., 1967, SOCIAL REALITY RELIG