Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial

被引:119
作者
den Dulk, Marcel
Marijnen, Corrie A. M.
Putter, Hein
Rutten, Harm J. T.
Beets, Geerard L.
Wiggers, Theo
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] NKI AVL, Dept Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[6] Univ Hosp Maastricht, Dept Surg, Maastricht, Netherlands
[7] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Surg, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
[8] UMCN, Dept Pathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000259432.29056.9d
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study was performed to identify tumor- and patient-related risk factors for distal rectal cancer in patients treated with an abdominoperineal resection (APR) associated with positive circumferential resection margin (CRM), local recurrence (LR), and overall survival (OS). Background: The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) has improved the outcome of patients with rectal cancer. However, survival of patients treated with an APR improved less than of those treated with low anterior resections (LAR). Besides, an APR is associated with a higher LR rate. Methods: Patients were selected from the TME trial, which is a randomized, multicenter trial, studying the effects of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in 1861 patients. Of the Dutch patients, 455 underwent an APR. Location of the bulk of the tumor was scored with surgery, pathology, or other reports. CRM was available from pathology reports. Result: A positive CRM was found in 29.6% of all patients, 44% for anterior, 21% for lateral, 23% for posterior, and 17% for (semi)circular tumor location (P < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, T-stage, N-stage, and tumor location were independent risk factors for CRM. If a (partial) resection of the vaginal wall was performed in women, 47.8% of patients still had a positive CKM. T-stage, N-stage, and CRM were risk factors for LR and age, T-stage, N-stage, CRM, and distance of the inferior tumor margin to the anal verge for OS. Conclusion: Age, T-stage, N-stage, CRM, distance of the tumor to the anal verge, and tumor location were independent risk factors for adverse outcome in patients treated with an APR for low rectal cancer. Anterior location, specifically in women, more often requires downstaging and/or more extended resection to obtain free margins.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 90
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]   LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA DUE TO INADEQUATE SURGICAL RESECTION - HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF LATERAL TUMOR SPREAD AND SURGICAL EXCISION [J].
QUIRKE, P ;
DIXON, MF ;
DURDEY, P ;
WILLIAMS, NS .
LANCET, 1986, 2 (8514) :996-999
[22]   THE PREDICTION OF LOCAL RECURRENCE IN RECTAL ADENOCARCINOMA BY HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION [J].
QUIRKE, P ;
DIXON, MF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 1988, 3 (02) :127-131
[23]  
Quirke P., 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, P3512, DOI [10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.3512, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2006.24.18_SUPPL.3512]
[24]   Evidence of the effect of 'specialization' on the management, surgical outcome and survival from colorectal cancer in Wessex [J].
Smith, JAE ;
King, PM ;
Lane, RHS ;
Thompson, MR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (05) :583-592
[25]   A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit [J].
Wibe, A ;
Moller, B ;
Norstein, J ;
Carlsen, E ;
Wiig, JN ;
Heald, RJ ;
Langmark, F ;
Myrvold, HE ;
Soreide, O .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (07) :857-866