Pulse crops for the northern Great Plains: II. Cropping sequence effects on cereal, oilseed, and pulse crops

被引:35
作者
Miller, PR
Gan, Y
McConkey, BG
McDonald, CL
机构
[1] Montana State Univ, Dept Land Resour & Environm Sci, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Semiarid Prairie Agr Res Cent, Swift Current, SK S9H 3X2, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2003.0980
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
To optimize cropping system benefits from pulse crops, it is important to understand their effects on subsequent crops. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) stubbles on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), mustard (Brassica juncea L.) or canola (B. napus L.), and lentil or pea when grown on soils with clay and loam textures. This study was conducted between 1996 and 1999 in southwestern Saskatchewan. Rotational benefits of pulse crops (chickpea, lentil, and pea) to wheat appeared more consistent on the clay than the silt loam soil. Adjusting fertilizer N rates to account for estimated total N contribution from the previous pulse crop effectively neutralized the benefits on wheat yield and protein compared with the effects following mustard. Canola or mustard productivity was occasionally greater when grown on pea or lentil stubbles compared with mustard and wheat stubbles. The yield increase was attributed to increased available water. Under drier-than-normal conditions, pea yields were highest when grown on wheat stubble. Wheat productivity was least when grown on its own stubble. Pea and lentil provided rotational benefits to wheat, mustard, and canola and benefitted most from being grown in wheat stubble, indicating a strong fit for diversified cropping systems on the semiarid northern Great Plains.
引用
收藏
页码:980 / 986
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Angadi S., 1999, DEV VIABLE CROPPING
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SAS STAT US GUID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1970, TECHN INT C ADV AUT
[4]  
*AOAC, 2000, OFF METH AN
[5]   GRAIN LEGUME EFFECTS ON SOIL-NITROGEN, GRAIN-YIELD, AND NITROGEN NUTRITION OF WHEAT [J].
BADARUDDIN, M ;
MEYER, DW .
CROP SCIENCE, 1994, 34 (05) :1304-1309
[6]   Comparison between test and analysis of a tank bulkhead loaded in the plastic range [J].
Becker, W ;
Wacker, T .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 1 (01) :77-81
[7]   THE 1ST 12 YEARS OF A LONG-TERM CROP-ROTATION STUDY IN SOUTHWESTERN SASKATCHEWAN - NITRATE-N DISTRIBUTION IN SOIL AND N UPTAKE BY THE PLANT [J].
CAMPBELL, CA ;
READ, DWL ;
BIEDERBECK, VO ;
WINKLEMAN, GE .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1983, 63 (03) :563-578
[8]   Method for Precision Nitrogen Management in Spring Wheat: I Fundamental Relationships [J].
Engel R.E. ;
Long D.S. ;
Carlson G.R. ;
Meier C. .
Precision Agriculture, 1999, 1 (3) :327-338
[9]   Influence of diverse cropping sequences on durum wheat yield and protein in the semiarid northern Great Plains [J].
Gan, YT ;
Miller, PR ;
McConkey, BG ;
Zentner, RP ;
Stevenson, FC ;
McDonald, CL .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (02) :245-252
[10]   Managing plant disease risk in diversified cropping systems [J].
Krupinsky, JM ;
Bailey, KL ;
McMullen, MP ;
Gossen, BD ;
Turkington, TK .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (02) :198-209