Cystic fibrosis: selecting the prenatal screening strategy of choice

被引:16
作者
Wald, NJ
Morris, JK
Rodeck, CH
Haddow, JE
Palomaki, GE
机构
[1] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Dept Environm & Prevent Med, London EC1M 6BQ, England
[2] UCL, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London, England
[3] Fdn Blood Res, Scarborough, ME 04074 USA
关键词
cystic fibrosis; prenatal screening; couple screening;
D O I
10.1002/pd.618
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Cystic fibrosis is a serious disorder. Research into the treatment of affected individuals is in progress, but a cure is not expected in the near future. In this review, we demonstrate that prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis meets the requirements for a worthwhile screening programme. We explain the reasons that have led us to conclude that one approach ('couple screening') is the method of choice. The couple-based approach calls for reporting results to the couple as a unit. Only if both parents are found to be carriers is the result designated screen-positive and an amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling offered. This offers a substantial reduction in the proportion of women with unaffected pregnancies with positive results (the false-positive rate) compared with other methods without reducing the detection of affected pregnancies. It also avoids creating a screen-positive group for which no definitive diagnosis is available. This is a problem with other screening methods. The couple method can achieve a 72% detection rate for a 0.1% false-positive rate. The screening method is simple, non-invasive, reliable, safe and reasonably cost effective. Existing programmes have shown that screening using this method is acceptable to health care professionals and patients. Setting up a national prenatal screening programme for cystic fibrosis is timely and should be implemented using the couple screening method. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 483
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] ABELIOVICH D, 1992, AM J HUM GENET, V51, P951
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, PREC PREN CARR SCREE
  • [3] UPTAKE OF CYSTIC-FIBROSIS TESTING IN PRIMARY-CARE - SUPPLY PUSH OR DEMAND PULL
    BEKKER, H
    MODELL, M
    DENNISS, G
    SILVER, A
    MATHEW, C
    BOBROW, M
    MARTEAU, T
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 306 (6892): : 1584 - 1586
  • [4] CYSTIC-FIBROSIS IN ASIANS
    BOWLER, IM
    ESTLIN, EJ
    LITTLEWOOD, JM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1993, 68 (01) : 120 - 122
  • [5] *BRIT PAED ASS WOR, 1988, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V195, P1599
  • [6] Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: 5 years' experience reviewed
    Brock, DJH
    [J]. LANCET, 1996, 347 (8995) : 148 - 150
  • [7] BROCK DJH, 2000, ANTENATAL NEONATOL S
  • [8] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTENATAL SCREENING FOR CYSTIC-FIBROSIS
    CUCKLE, HS
    RICHARDSON, GA
    SHELDON, TA
    QUIRKE, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7018) : 1460 - 1463
  • [9] ABSENCE OF CYSTIC-FIBROSIS MUTATIONS IN A LARGE ASIAN POPULATION-SAMPLE AND OCCURRENCE OF A HOMOZYGOUS S549N-MUTATION IN AN INBRED PAKISTANI FAMILY
    CURTIS, A
    RICHARDSON, RJ
    BOOHENE, J
    JACKSON, A
    NELSON, R
    BHATTACHARYA, SS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1993, 30 (02) : 164 - 166
  • [10] *CYST FIBR FDN, 2000, PAT REG 1994 ANN REP