MR imaging of the small bowel with increasing concentrations of an oral osmotic agent

被引:16
作者
Borthne, AS
Abdelnoor, M
Hellund, JC
Geitung, JT
Storaas, T
Gjesdal, KI
Klow, NE
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Pediat Radiol, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[3] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Unit Epidemiol & Biostat, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[4] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Med Phys, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
关键词
MR imaging; small bowel; gastrointestinal tract; gastrografin; osmotic agent;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2636-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the quality of MR imaging and level of adverse effects with increasing concentrations of gastrografin. This is a prospective study with 24 healthy volunteers which were randomised into four groups receiving 50%, 25%, 10% and 0% gastrografin. The endpoint was bowel image quality based on distension, signal homogeneity and wall delineation evaluated by three independent radiologists, and the maximum bowel diameter at three different levels. The subjects also scored any adverse events on a 1-5 scale. The interradiologist agreement was relatively good, with kappa values varying between 0.81 and 0.41. Improved bowel distension and image quality were achieved with increasing concentrations. But significant dose-response effects were found between increasing osmolalities and the bowel diameters and also versus the score of adverse events. The most frequent adverse reactions were diarrhea, nausea and lack of palatability. There is a gradient relationship between increasing osmolality of gastrografin and improved image quality and the score of adverse effects. The optimum concentration of gastrografin is dependent of the tolerance of the adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 671
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Oral contrast agents for small bowel MRI: comparison of different additives to optimize bowel distension [J].
Ajaj, W ;
Goehde, SC ;
Schneemann, H ;
Ruehm, SG ;
Debatin, JF ;
Lauenstein, TC .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) :458-464
[2]  
ALTMAN DG, 1996, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[3]   Bariumexamintions of the small intestine and the colon in inflammatory bowel disease [J].
Antes, G .
RADIOLOGE, 2003, 43 (01) :9-16
[4]   MRI with oral filling in patients with chronic inflammatory bowel diseases [J].
Born, C ;
Nagel, B ;
Leinsinger, G ;
Reiser, M .
RADIOLOGE, 2003, 43 (01) :34-42
[5]   Bowel MR imaging with oral Gastrografin: an experimental study with healthy volunteers [J].
Borthne, AS ;
Dormagen, JB ;
Gjesdal, KI ;
Storaas, T ;
Lygren, I ;
Geitung, JT .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (01) :100-106
[6]  
Brown J J, 1996, Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, V4, P25
[7]   High-density oral barium sulfate in abdominal MRI: Efficacy and tolerance in a clinical setting [J].
Burton, SS ;
Liebig, T ;
Frazier, SD ;
Ros, PR .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 15 (02) :147-153
[8]   MRI of the small and large bowel [J].
Debatin, JF ;
Patak, MA .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (08) :1523-1534
[9]   A GOODNESS-OF-FIT APPROACH TO INFERENCE PROCEDURES FOR THE KAPPA-STATISTIC - CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL CONSTRUCTION, SIGNIFICANCE-TESTING AND SAMPLE-SIZE ESTIMATION [J].
DONNER, A ;
ELIASZIW, M .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1992, 11 (11) :1511-1519
[10]   Oral administration of a low-cost negative contrast agent: A three-year experience in routine practice [J].
Ernst, O ;
Sergent, G ;
LHermine, C .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (03) :495-498