The helical tomotherapy thread effect

被引:109
作者
Kissick, MW [1 ]
Fenwick, J
James, JA
Jerai, R
Kapatoes, JM
Keller, H
Mackie, TR
Olivera, G
Soisson, ET
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Engn Phys, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Human Oncol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[4] TomoTherapy Inc, Madison, WI 53717 USA
[5] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
helical; tomotherapy; thread; dose uniformity;
D O I
10.1118/1.1896453
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Inherent to helical tomotherapy is a dose variation pattern that manifests as a "ripple" (peak-to-trough relative to the average). This ripple is the result of helical beam junctioning, completely unique to helical tomotherapy. Pitch is defined as in helical CT, the couch travel distance for a complete gantry rotation relative to the axial beam width at the axis of rotation. Without scattering or beam divergence, an analytical posing of the problem as a simple integral predicts minima near a pitch of l In where n is an integer. A convolution-superposition dose calculator (TomoTherapy, Inc.) included all the physics needed to explore the ripple magnitude versus pitch and beam width. The results of the dose calculator and some benchmark measurements demonstrate that the ripple has sharp minima near p=0.86(1/n). The 0.86 factor is empirical and caused by a beam junctioning of the off-axis dose profiles which differ from the axial profiles as well as a long scatter tail of the profiles at depth. For very strong intensity modulation, the 0.86 factor may vary. The authors propose choosing particular minima pitches or using a second delivery that starts 180 deg off-phase from the first to reduce these ripples: "Double threading." For current typical pitches and beam widths, however, this effect is small and not clinically important for most situations. Certain extremely large field or high pitch cases, however, may benefit from mitigation of this effect. (c) 2005 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1414 / 1423
页数:10
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   PEACOCK(TM) - A SYSTEM FOR PLANNING AND ROTATIONAL DELIVERY OF INTENSITY-MODULATED FIELDS [J].
CAROL, MP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 6 (01) :56-61
[2]   Modelling simple helically delivered dose distributions [J].
Fenwick, JD ;
Tomé, WA ;
Kissick, MW ;
Mackie, TR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (07) :1505-1517
[3]   Accurate convolution/superposition for multi-resolution dose calculation using cumulative tabulated kernels [J].
Lu, WG ;
Olivera, GH ;
Chen, ML ;
Reckwerdt, PJ ;
Mackie, TR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (04) :655-680
[4]   Tomotherapy [J].
Mackie, TR ;
Balog, J ;
Ruchala, K ;
Shepard, D ;
Aldridge, S ;
Fitchard, E ;
Reckwerdt, P ;
Olivera, G ;
McNutt, T ;
Mehta, M .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :108-117
[5]   TOMOTHERAPY - A NEW CONCEPT FOR THE DELIVERY OF DYNAMIC CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY [J].
MACKIE, TR ;
HOLMES, T ;
SWERDLOFF, S ;
RECKWERDT, P ;
DEASY, JO ;
YANG, J ;
PALIWAL, B ;
KINSELLA, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (06) :1709-1719
[6]   A spiral phantom for IMRT and tomotherapy treatment delivery verification [J].
Paliwal, B ;
Tomé, W ;
Richardson, S ;
Mackie, TR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (11) :2503-2507
[7]   Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system [J].
Ruchala, KJ ;
Olivera, GH ;
Schloesser, EA ;
Mackie, TR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (10) :2597-2621