Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in house dust and residential soil

被引:14
作者
Chuang, JC
Pollard, MA
Chou, YL
Menton, RG
Wilson, NK
机构
[1] Battelle Mem Inst, Columbus, OH 43201 USA
[2] US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; PAH; dust; soil; GC/MS; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ELISA;
D O I
10.1016/S0048-9697(98)00351-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and carcinogenic PAH (C-PAH) were evaluated. The testing procedures were refined for application to screening PAH and C-PAH in house dust and soil samples for human exposure studies. The overall method precision expressed as percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) of triplicate real world dust and soil samples was within +/-29% (12-29%) for PAH ELISA and +/-21% (5.9-21%) for C-PAH ELISA. Spike recoveries from real world dust/soil samples were 114 +/- 30% for phenanthrene from PAH ELISA and 120 +/- 8.2% for benzo[a]pyrene from C-PAH ELISA. The overall method accuracy for PAH and C-PAH assays Cannot be assessed for multiple PAH components in dust/soil samples (which represent real-world samples), because of the assays' cross reactivities with other PAH components. Over 100 dust/soil samples from 13 North Carolina homes and 22 Arizona homes were analyzed by PAH and C-PAH assays, as well as by the conventional gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) method. Statistical analysis showed that dust/soil PAH data from ELISA and GC/MS methods are significantly different. In general PAH ELISA responses were higher than PAH GC/MS responses. The regression analysis showed that the linear relationship between ELISA and GC/MS measurements is not strong in the combined data. The relationship became stronger for the data from the same type of dust/soil samples. The screening performance of ELISA was evaluated based on the frequency distribution of ELISA and GC/MS data. The results indicated that the ELISA PAH and C-PAH assays cannot be used as a quantitative analytical tool for determining PAH in real-world dust/soil samples. However, the ELISA is an effective screening tool for ranking PAH concentrations in similar types of real world dust/soil samples. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 199
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] *ASTM, 1997, D444492 ASTM, P517
  • [2] Belsley D.A., 1980, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
  • [3] MONITORING METHODS FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS AND THEIR DISTRIBUTION IN-HOUSE DUST AND TRACK-IN SOIL
    CHUANG, JC
    CALLAHAN, PJ
    MENTON, RG
    GORDON, SM
    LEWIS, RG
    WILSON, NK
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 29 (02) : 494 - 500
  • [4] CHUANG JC, 1996, FIELD METHOD EVALUAT
  • [5] *IARC, 1985, IARC MON EV CARC RIS, V35
  • [6] *IARC, 1983, IARC MON EV CARC RIS, V32, P95
  • [7] Quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in environmental soil and sediment samples
    Johnson, JC
    VanEmon, JM
    [J]. ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 68 (01) : 162 - 169
  • [8] LEBOWITZ MD, 1995, J EXPO ANAL ENV EPID, V5, P297
  • [9] Lloyd J W, 1971, J Occup Med, V13, P53, DOI 10.1097/00043764-197102000-00001
  • [10] LOPEZAVILA V, 1996, FOOD TESTING ANAL, V28, P35