A comparison of independent star formation diagnostics for an ultraviolet-selected sample of nearby galaxies

被引:117
作者
Sullivan, M
Mobasher, B
Chan, B
Cram, L
Ellis, R
Treyer, M
Hopkins, A
机构
[1] Inst Astron, Cambridge CB3 0HA, England
[2] CALTECH, Dept Astron, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Space Telescope Sci Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] European Space Agcy, Div Astrophys, F-75738 Paris 15, France
[5] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[6] Astron Spatiale Lab, F-19976 Marseille, France
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys & Astron, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
galaxies : evolution; galaxies : starburst; radio continuum : galaxies; stars : formation; surveys; ultraviolet : galaxies;
D O I
10.1086/322451
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present results from a decimetric radio survey undertaken with the Very Large Array as part of a longer term goal to intercompare star formation and dust extinction diagnostics on a galaxy-by-galaxy basis for a representative sample of nearby galaxies. For our survey field, Selected Area 57, star formation rates derived from 1.4 GHz luminosities are compared with earlier nebular emission-line and ultraviolet (UV) continuum diagnostics. We find broad correlations, over several decades in luminosity, between the Hoe, UV continuum, and 1.4 GHz diagnostics. However, the scatter in these relations is found to be larger than observational errors, with offsets between the observed relations and those expected assuming constant star formation histories and luminosity-independent extinction models. We investigate the physical origin of the observed relations and conclude that the discrepancies between different star formation diagnostics can only be partly explained by simple models of dust extinction in galaxies. These models cannot by themselves explain all the observed differences, introducing the need for temporally varying star formation histories and/or more complex models of extinction to explain the entire data set.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 80
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   The epoch of galaxy formation [J].
Baugh, CM ;
Cole, S ;
Frenk, CS ;
Lacey, CG .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 498 (02) :504-521
[2]   A comparison of ultraviolet imaging telescope far-ultraviolet and Hα star formation rates [J].
Bell, EF ;
Kennicutt, RC .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 548 (02) :681-693
[3]   The history of star formation in dusty galaxies [J].
Blain, AW ;
Smail, I ;
Ivison, RJ ;
Kneib, JP .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 302 (04) :632-648
[4]   The dust content and opacity of actively star-forming galaxies [J].
Calzetti, D ;
Armus, L ;
Bohlin, RC ;
Kinney, AL ;
Koornneef, J ;
Storchi-Bergmann, T .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 533 (02) :682-695
[5]  
Calzetti D, 1997, AIP CONF PROC, V408, P403, DOI 10.1063/1.53764
[6]   A simple model for the absorption of starlight by dust in galaxies [J].
Charlot, S ;
Fall, SM .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 539 (02) :718-731
[7]   Nebular emission from star-forming galaxies [J].
Charlot, S ;
Longhetti, M .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 323 (04) :887-903
[8]  
CHI X, 1990, MON NOT R ASTRON SOC, V245, P101
[9]   Hierarchical galaxy formation [J].
Cole, S ;
Lacey, CG ;
Baugh, CM ;
Frenk, CS .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2000, 319 (01) :168-204
[10]   RADIO-EMISSION FROM NORMAL GALAXIES [J].
CONDON, JJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 1992, 30 :575-611