Anaphylaxis in the United States - An investigation into its epidemiology

被引:292
作者
Neugut, AI
Ghatak, AT
Miller, RL
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Joseph L Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] DEY Corp, Napa, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.161.1.15
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction that affects both children and adults in the United States. However, data regarding the incidence and prevalence of anaphylaxis and the number of deaths caused by it are limited. Objective: To provide a better understanding of the magnitude of the problem of anaphylaxis in the United States. Methods: A thorough review of the current medical literature was conducted to obtain prevalence estimates on each of the 4 major subtypes of anaphylaxis (food, drugs, latex, and insect stings). We calculated an overall estimate of the risk of anaphylaxis by using only estimates that are specifically derived from epidemiologic studies measuring anaphylaxis in the general population. Results: Known rates or cases of anaphylaxis were 0.0004% for food, 0.7% to 10% for penicillin, 0.22% to 1% for radiocontrast media, and 0.5% to 5% after insect stings. There were 220 cases after latex exposure. Considering the 1999 US population of 272 million, the population at risk for anaphylaxis from food is 1099, from penicillin is 1.9 million to 27.2 million, from radiocontrast media is 22 000 to 100 000, from latex is 220, and from insect stings is 1.36 million to 13.6 million. These calculations yield a total of 1.29 million to 40.9 million individuals at risk of anaphylaxis. Conclusion: The occurrence of anaphylaxis in the US is not as rare as is generally believed. On the basis of our figures, the problem of anaphylaxis may, in fact, affect 1.21% to 15.04% of the US population.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 21
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   ALLERGIC REACTIONS TO DRUGS AND BIOLOGICAL AGENTS [J].
ANDERSON, JA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 268 (20) :2845-2857
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, INT CLASS DIS
[3]   THE CURRENT STATUS OF REACTIONS TO INTRAVENOUS CONTRAST-MEDIA [J].
ANSELL, G ;
TWEEDIE, MCK ;
WEST, CR ;
EVANS, DAP ;
COUCH, L .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1980, 15 (06) :S32-S39
[4]   PREVALENCE OF LATEX SENSITIZATION AMONG HOSPITAL PHYSICIANS OCCUPATIONALLY EXPOSED TO LATEX GLOVES [J].
ARELLANO, R ;
BRADLEY, J ;
SUSSMAN, G .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (05) :905-908
[5]   ANAPHYLAXIS [J].
BOCHNER, BS ;
LICHTENSTEIN, LM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (25) :1785-1790
[6]   THE INCIDENCE OF SEVERE ADVERSE REACTIONS TO FOOD IN COLORADO [J].
BOCK, SA .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1992, 90 (04) :683-685
[7]  
*BOST COLL DRUG SU, 1973, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V224, P613
[8]   ACUTE REACTIONS TO INTRAVASCULAR CONTRAST-MEDIA - TYPES, RISK-FACTORS, RECOGNITION, AND SPECIFIC TREATMENT [J].
BUSH, WH ;
SWANSON, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 157 (06) :1153-1161
[9]   TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC REACTIONS TO CONTRAST-MEDIA [J].
BUSH, WH .
UROLOGY, 1990, 35 (02) :145-150
[10]  
*CDCP, 1994, DHHS PUBL