Detonation charge size versus coda magnitude relations in California and Nevada

被引:11
作者
Brocher, TM [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1785/0120020185
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Magnitude-charge size relations have important uses in forensic seismology and are used in Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty monitoring. I derive empirical magnitude versus detonation-charge-size relationships for 322 detonations located by permanent seismic networks in California and Nevada. These detonations, used in 41 different seismic refraction or network calibration experiments, ranged in yield (charge size) between 25 and 10(6) kg; coda magnitudes reported for them ranged from 0.5 to 3.9. Almost all represent simultaneous (single-fired) detonations of one or more boreholes. Repeated detonations at the same shotpoint suggest that the reported coda magnitudes are repeatable, on average, to within 0.1 magnitude unit. An empirical linear regression for these 322 detonations yields M = 0.31 + 0.50 log(10)(weight [kg]). The detonations compiled here demonstrate that the Khalturin et al. (1998) relationship, developed mainly for data from large chemical explosions but which fits data from nuclear blasts, can be used to estimate the minimum charge size for coda magnitudes between 0.5 and 3.9. Drilling, loading, and shooting logs indicate that the explosive specification, loading method, and effectiveness of tamp are the primary factors determining the efficiency of a detonation. These records indicate that locating a detonation within the water table is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for an efficient shot.
引用
收藏
页码:2089 / 2105
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] AMBOS EL, 1987, EOS, V68, P1360
  • [2] BERGE PA, 1986, 86362 US GEOL SURV
  • [3] BLUMLING P, 1985, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V75, P193
  • [4] BROCHER TM, 2003, IN PRESS SEISM RES L
  • [5] BROCHER TM, 1989, 89133 US GEOL SURV
  • [6] Colburn R.H., 1984, 84643 US GEOL SURV
  • [7] CTBTO, 2002, CTBTO ANN REP 2002
  • [8] EATON JP, 1992, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V82, P533
  • [9] EBERHARTPHILLIP.E, 1994, 94590 US GEOL SURV
  • [10] Fliedner MM, 1996, GEOLOGY, V24, P367, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0367:TDCSOT>2.3.CO