An investigation of analysis of variance as a tool for exploring regional differences in strong ground motions

被引:52
作者
Douglas, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
analysis of variance; attenuation relations; ground motion estimation; regional dependence; regression analysis; strong ground motion; strong-motion data;
D O I
10.1007/s10950-004-3094-7
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The statistical technique known as analysis of variance is applied to a large set of European strong-motion data to investigate whether strong ground motions show a regional dependence. This question is important when selecting strong-motion records for the derivation of ground motion prediction equations and also when choosing strong-motion records from one geographical region for design purposes in another. Five regions with much strong-motion data (the Caucasus region, central Italy, Friuli, Greece and south Iceland) are investigated here. For the magnitude and distance range where there are overlapping data from the five areas (2.50 less than or equal to M-s less than or equal to 5.50, 0 less than or equal to d less than or equal to 35 km) and consequently analysis of variance can be performed, there is little evidence for a regional dependence of ground motions. There is a lack of data from moderate and large magnitude earthquakes (M-s > 5.5) so analysis of variance cannot be performed there. Since there is uncertainty regarding scaling ground motions from small to large magnitudes whether ground motions from large earthquakes are significantly different in different parts of Europe is not known. Analysis of variance has the ability to complement other techniques for the assessment of regional dependence of ground motions.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 496
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], 2004, DISSEMINATION EUROPE
[12]   Seismotectonics of the central part of the South Iceland Seismic Zone [J].
Bergerat, F ;
Gudmundsson, A ;
Angelier, J ;
Rögnvaldsson, ST .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1998, 298 (04) :319-335
[13]  
Boore David M., 1993, Open-file report 93-509
[14]  
BOORE DM, 1983, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V73, P1865
[16]   Active tectonics in the central Apennines and possible implications for seismic hazard analysis in peninsular Italy [J].
Cello, G ;
Mazzoli, S ;
Tondi, E ;
Turco, E .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1997, 272 (01) :43-68
[17]   Global comparisons of earthquake source spectra [J].
Chen, SZ ;
Atkinson, GM .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2002, 92 (03) :885-895
[18]   What is a Poor Quality Strong-Motion Record? [J].
Douglas, J. .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2003, 1 (01) :141-156
[19]   Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates [J].
Douglas, J .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2003, 61 (1-2) :43-104
[20]   How accurate can strong ground motion attenuation relations be? [J].
Douglas, J ;
Smit, PM .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 91 (06) :1917-1923