Image magnification does not contribute to the repeatability of caliper placement in measuring nuchal translucency thickness

被引:22
作者
Herman, A [1 ]
Maymon, R [1 ]
Dreazen, E [1 ]
Caspi, E [1 ]
Bukovsky, I [1 ]
Weinraub, Z [1 ]
机构
[1] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
关键词
nuchal translucency; caliper placement; repeatability; image magnification;
D O I
10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11040266.x
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to assess whether nuchal translucency image magnification contributes to the repeatability of caliper placement. Twenty-seven women undergoing first-trimester ultrasound screening at 11-14 weeks were examined by two qualified examiners. Fetal nuchal translucency thickness was measured twice by each examiner on a regular-sized image and subsequently, on the same still image magnified. Intraobserver repeatability coefficients of the regular-sized images were 0.28 mm and 0.34 mm for examiners A and B, respectively Identical intraobserver repeatability coefficients of 0.28?nm were attained for both examiners on the magnified images. Interobserver repeatability of regular-sized image measurements showed a significant difference (p<0.01) but the mean difference (+/- standard deviation) of 0.10 (0.18) mm was negligible. Similarly, interobserver repeatability of the magnified-image measurements yielded a significant difference (p < 0.02), but again with a small mean difference of 0.13 (0.26) mm. There were also significant differences when regular-sized images and magnified images were compared for both examiners: 0.08 (0.16) mm for examiner A (p < 0.02) and 0.10 (0.17) mm for examiner B (p < 0.01). Our results demonstrate that nuchal translucency image magnification does nor contribute to the reproducibility of the measurement. Despite significantly smaller mean values obtained from the magnified images, compared to the regular-sized measurements, those differences do not justify modification of the criteria for caliper placement on magnified images. Blind repeated measurements on a regular-sized and/or magnified image are recommended as a tool for self-assessment, quality control and training.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 270
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Comparison between two methods of standardization for gestational age differences in fetal nuchal translucency measurement in first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 [J].
Bingiotti, R ;
Periti, E ;
Brizzi, L ;
Vanzi, E ;
Cariati, E .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 9 (04) :248-252
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   THE MEASUREMENT OF NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY WITH TRANSABDOMINAL AND TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHY - SUCCESS RATES, REPEATABILITY AND LEVELS OF AGREEMENT [J].
BRAITHWAITE, JM ;
ECONOMIDES, DL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (811) :720-723
[4]   Nuchal translucency measurement: Training of potential examiners [J].
Braithwaite, JM ;
Kadir, RA ;
Pepera, TA ;
Morris, RW ;
Thompson, PJ ;
Economides, DL .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 8 (03) :192-195
[5]   FIRST-TRIMESTER NUCHAL EDEMA AS A MARKER OF ANEUPLOIDY [J].
COMAS, C ;
MARTINEZ, JM ;
OJUEL, J ;
CASALS, E ;
PUERTO, B ;
BORRELL, A ;
FORTUNY, A .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 5 (01) :26-29
[6]  
Kornman LH, 1996, PRENATAL DIAG, V16, P797, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199609)16:9<797::AID-PD948>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-D
[8]   FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY - ULTRASOUND SCREENING FOR CHROMOSOMAL DEFECTS IN 1ST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY [J].
NICOLAIDES, KH ;
AZAR, G ;
BYRNE, D ;
MANSUR, C ;
MARKS, K .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6831) :867-869
[9]   Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation [J].
Pandya, PP ;
Snijders, RJM ;
Johnson, SP ;
Brizot, MD ;
Nicolaides, KH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (12) :957-962
[10]   REPEATABILITY OF MEASUREMENT OF FETAL NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY THICKNESS [J].
PANDYA, PP ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
BRIZOT, ML ;
PETTERSEN, H ;
NICOLAIDES, KH .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 5 (05) :334-337