Empirically supported psychological, interventions: Controversies and evidence

被引:1195
作者
Chambless, DL [1 ]
Ollendick, TH
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ctr Child Study, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
empirically supported therapies; empirically validated treatments; psychotherapy efficacy; psychotherapy effectiveness;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.685
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Efforts to increase the practice of evidence-based psychotherapy in the United States have led to the formation of task forces to define, identify, and disseminate information about empirically supported psychological interventions. The work of several such task forces and other groups reviewing empirically supported treatments (ESTs) in the United States, United Kingdom, and elsewhere is summarized here, along with the lists of treatments that have been identified as ESTs. Also reviewed is the controversy surrounding EST identification and dissemination, including concerns about research methodology, external validity, and utility of EST research, as well as the reliability and transparency of the EST review process.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 716
页数:32
相关论文
共 87 条