Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: A prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes

被引:61
作者
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro [1 ]
Rosati, Riccardo [1 ]
Bona, Stefano [1 ]
Rottoli, Matteo [1 ]
Elmore, Ugo [1 ]
Ceriani, Chiara [1 ]
Malesci, Alberto [2 ]
Montorsi, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Ist Clin Humanitas IRCCS, Sect Colorectal & Minimally Invas Surg, Dept Gen Surg, I-20089 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Ist Clin Humanitas IRCCS, Operating Unit Gastroenterol, Milan, Italy
关键词
rectal cancer; laparoscopic surgery; total mesorectal excision; laparoscopic colon resection;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-007-9055-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: The role of laparoscopic resection in the management of rectal cancer is still controversial. We prospectively evaluated patient survival and outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer at a single institution. METHODS: From November 1999 to November 2005, 107 patients with rectal cancer were treated by laparoscopy. Exclusion criteria were: metastatic disease, advanced disease with invasion of adjacent structures, clinical or radiologic involvement of the external anal sphincter, previous colonic resection, synchronous colonic adenocarcinoma, and contraindications to laparoscopy. All patients were followed prospectively for survival and complications. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A laparoscopic sphincter-saving procedure was performed in 104 patients, 2 patients had a laparoscopic Miles operation, and 1 underwent a laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure. Mean operating time was 278 (range, 135-430) minutes. Conversion to open surgery was required in 20 of 107 patients (18.7 percent). Overall morbidity was 27 percent, anastomotic leakage occurred in 14 of 104 patients (13.5 percent). There was no postoperative mortality. A mean of 18 (range, 1-49) lymph nodes was removed. Mean distance of distal margin from tumor was 2.6 (range, 0.5-10) cm; in two patients there was microscopic invasion of the distal margin. Mean hospital stay was nine (range, 4-43) days. Mean follow-up was 35.8 months. There was local recurrence in 1 of 107 patients (0.95 percent); there were no port site metastases. Actuarial five-year and disease-free survival rates are 81.4 and 79.8 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic rectal surgery is feasible and oncologically radical but also technically demanding (conversion rate, 18.7 percent), time-consuming (mean operating time, 278 minutes), and associated with specific intraoperative complications. At present, the technique should only be performed in specialist centers by teams experienced in laparoscopic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:2047 / 2053
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients
    Anthuber, M
    Fuerst, A
    Elser, F
    Berger, R
    Jauch, KW
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (08) : 1047 - 1053
  • [2] Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer -: Outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature
    Bärlehner, E
    Benhidjeb, T
    Anders, S
    Schicke, B
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (06): : 757 - 766
  • [3] Endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance in preoperative staging of rectal cancer: Comparison with histologic findings
    Bianchi, PP
    Ceriani, C
    Rottoli, M
    Tozilli, G
    Pompili, G
    Malesci, A
    Ferraroni, M
    Montorsi, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2005, 9 (09) : 1222 - 1227
  • [4] Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial
    Bonjer, HJ
    Haglind, E
    Jeekel, I
    Kazemier, G
    Páhlman, L
    Hop, WCJ
    Veldkamp, R
    Kuhry, E
    Haglind, E
    Pahlman, L
    Cuesta, MA
    Msika, S
    Morino, M
    Lacy, A
    Jeekel, I
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) : 477 - 484
  • [5] The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma
    Bretagnol, F
    Lelong, B
    Laurent, C
    Moutardier, V
    Rullier, A
    Monges, G
    Delpero, JR
    Rullier, E
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (07): : 892 - 896
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Breukink, S.
    Pierie, J.
    Wiggers, T.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04):
  • [7] Carlsen E, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P526
  • [8] Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients -: Lessons learned from >200 patients
    Delgado, S
    Momblán, D
    Salvador, L
    Bravo, R
    Castells, A
    Ibarzabal, A
    Piqué, JM
    Lacy, AM
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (10): : 1457 - 1462
  • [9] Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer - Long-term outcome
    Dulucq, JL
    Wintringer, P
    Stabilini, C
    Mahajna, A
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (11): : 1468 - 1474
  • [10] Long-term results of laparoscopic vs open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients
    Feliciotti, F
    Guerrieri, M
    Paganini, AM
    De Sanctis, A
    Campagnacci, R
    Perretta, S
    D'Ambrosio, G
    Lezoche, G
    Lezoche, E
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (10): : 1530 - 1535