An empirical survey on biobanking of human genetic material and data in six EU countries

被引:72
作者
Hirtzlin, I
Dubreuil, C
Préaubert, N
Duchier, J
Jansen, B
Simon, J
de Faria, PL
Perez-Lezaun, A
Visser, B
Williams, GD
Cambon-Thomsen, A
机构
[1] Univ Paris 01, F-75231 Paris 05, France
[2] Fac Med Toulouse, INSERM, U558, F-31073 Toulouse, France
[3] Europae Akad Umwelt & Wirtschaft, Luneburg, Germany
[4] Univ Nova Lisboa, Escola Nacl Saude Publ, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Unitat Biol Evolut, Dept Ciencies Expt & Salut, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Ctr Genet Resources, Wageningen, Netherlands
[7] Univ Cent Lancashire, Ctr Profess Eth, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
[8] ANAES, Paris, France
关键词
human biobanking; genetic collection management; Europe; empirical survey; ethics; economics;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Biobanks correspond to different situations: research and technological development, medical diagnosis or therapeutic activities. Their status is not clearly defined. We aimed to investigate human biobanking in Europe, particularly in relation to organisational, economic and ethical issues in various national contexts. Data from a survey in six EU countries ( France, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the UK) were collected as part of a European Research Project examining human and non-human biobanking (EUROGENBANK, coordinated by Professor JC Galloux). A total of 147 institutions concerned with biobanking of human samples and data were investigated by questionnaires and interviews. Most institutions surveyed belong to the public or private non-profit-making sectors, which have a key role in biobanking. This activity is increasing in all countries because few samples are discarded and genetic research is proliferating. Collections vary in size, many being small and only a few very large. Their purpose is often research, or research and healthcare, mostly in the context of disease studies. A specific budget is very rarely allocated to biobanking and costs are not often evaluated. Samples are usually provided free of charge and gifts and exchanges are the common rule. Good practice guidelines are generally followed and quality controls are performed but quality procedures are not always clearly explained. Associated data are usually computerised ( identified or identifiable samples). Biobankers generally favour centralisation of data rather than of samples. Legal and ethical harmonisation within Europe is considered likely to facilitate international collaboration. We propose a series of recommendations and suggestions arising from the EUROGENBANK project.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 488
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条