One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock

被引:442
作者
Hochman, JS [1 ]
Sleeper, LA [1 ]
White, HD [1 ]
Dzavik, V [1 ]
Wong, SC [1 ]
Menon, V [1 ]
Webb, JG [1 ]
Steingart, R [1 ]
Picard, MH [1 ]
Menegus, MA [1 ]
Boland, J [1 ]
Sanborn, T [1 ]
Buller, CE [1 ]
Modur, S [1 ]
Forman, R [1 ]
Desvigne-Nickens, P [1 ]
Jacobs, AK [1 ]
Slater, JN [1 ]
LeJemtel, TH [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp Ctr, New York, NY 10025 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2001年 / 285卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.285.2.190
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), Objective To assess the effect of early revascularization (ERV) on 1-year survival for patients with AMI complicated by CS. Design The SHOCK (Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock) Trial, an unblinded, randomized controlled trial from April 1993 through November 1998, Setting Thirty-six referral centers with angioplasty and cardiac surgery facilities. Patients Three hundred two patients with AMI and CS due to predominant left ventricular failure who met specified clinical and hemodynamic criteria. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to an initial medical stabilization (IMS; n =150) group, which included thrombolysis (63% of patients), intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (86%), and subsequent revascularization (25%), or to an ERV group (n=152), which mandated revascularization within 6 hours of randomization and included angioplasty (55%) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (38%). Main Outcome Measures All-cause mortality and functional status at 1 year, compared between the ERV and IMS groups. Results One-year survival was 46.7% for patients in the ERV group compared with 33.6% in the IMS group (absolute difference in survival, 13.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2%_24.1%; P<.03; relative risk for death, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95). Of the 10 prespecified subgroup analyses, only age (<75 vs greater than or equal to 75 years) interacted significantly (P<.03) with treatment in that treatment benefit was apparent only for patients younger than 75 years (51.6% survival in ERV group vs 33.3% in IMS group). Eighty-three percent of 1-year survivors (85% of ERV group and 80% of IMS group) were in New York Heart Association class I or II. Conclusions For patients with AMI complicated by CS, ERV resulted in improved 1-year survival. We recommend rapid transfer of patients with AMI complicated by CS, particularly those younger than 75 years, to medical centers capable of providing early angiography and revascularization procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 192
页数:3
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   RESULTS OF CORONARY-ARTERY SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH POOR LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION (CASS) [J].
ALDERMAN, EL ;
FISHER, LD ;
LITWIN, P ;
KAISER, GC ;
MYERS, WO ;
MAYNARD, C ;
LEVINE, F ;
SCHLOSS, M .
CIRCULATION, 1983, 68 (04) :785-795
[2]  
[Anonymous], IARC SCI PUB
[3]   A composite view of cardiac rupture in the United States National Registry of Myocardial Infarction [J].
Becker, RC ;
Gore, JM ;
Lambrew, C ;
Weaver, WD ;
Rubison, RM ;
French, WJ ;
Tiefenbrunn, AJ ;
Bowlby, LJ ;
Rogers, WJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 27 (06) :1321-1326
[4]  
DZAVIK V, 1998, EUR HEART J SUPPL, V19, P28
[5]   EARLY AND 1-YEAR SURVIVAL RATES IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION COMPLICATED BY CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY COMPARING CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY WITH MEDICAL-TREATMENT [J].
ELTCHANINOFF, H ;
SIMPFENDORFER, C ;
FRANCO, I ;
RAYMOND, RE ;
CASALE, PN ;
WHITLOW, PL .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 130 (03) :459-464
[6]   Ten-year follow-up of the first megatrial testing thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction - Results of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'infarto-1 study [J].
Franzosi, MG ;
Santoro, E ;
De Vita, C ;
Geraci, E ;
Lotto, A ;
Maggioni, AP ;
Mauri, F ;
Rovelli, F ;
Santoro, L ;
Tavazzi, L ;
Tognoni, G .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (24) :2659-2665
[7]   CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - THE USE OF CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY AND THE INTEGRATION OF THE NEW SUPPORT DEVICES INTO PATIENT-MANAGEMENT [J].
GACIOCH, GM ;
ELLIS, SG ;
LEE, L ;
BATES, ER ;
KIRSH, M ;
WALTON, JA ;
TOPOL, EJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 19 (03) :647-653
[8]   Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction [J].
Goldberg, RJ ;
Samad, NA ;
Yarzebski, J ;
Gurwitz, J ;
Bigelow, C ;
Gore, JM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1162-1168
[9]  
*GUTO 2 ANG SUBST, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P1621
[10]   Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction - Etiologies, management and outcome: A report from the SHOCK Trial Registry [J].
Hochman, JS ;
Buller, CE ;
Sleeper, LA ;
Boland, J ;
Dzavik, V ;
Sanborn, TA ;
Godfrey, E ;
White, HD ;
Lim, J ;
LeJemtel, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (03) :1063-1070